AI saves one hour of daily chest CT interpretation time in prospective randomized study

Written By :  Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli
Published On 2022-12-08 14:30 GMT   |   Update On 2022-12-08 14:30 GMT

Leesburg, VA: According to ARRS' American Journal of Roentgenology (AJR), incorporating AI support into clinical practice can reduce repetitive tasks, saving approximately one hour of chest CT interpretation time in a radiologist's typical workday. "This is the first study to our knowledge to assess the impact of an AI support platform on chest CT interpretation times in a real-world...

Login or Register to read the full article

Leesburg, VA: According to ARRS' American Journal of Roentgenology (AJR), incorporating AI support into clinical practice can reduce repetitive tasks, saving approximately one hour of chest CT interpretation time in a radiologist's typical workday.

"This is the first study to our knowledge to assess the impact of an AI support platform on chest CT interpretation times in a real-world clinical setting," corresponding author U. Joseph Schoepf from the Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC) noted. "The platform's integration into clinical workflow resulted in a mean reduction in interpretation times of 22.1% among three cardiothoracic radiologists for whom the AI results were made available."

Schoepf and colleagues' prospective study included 390 patients (204 female, 186 male; mean age, 62.8 years) who underwent outpatient chest CT at MUSC from January 19–28, 2021. A commercial software solution, AI-Rad Companion (Siemens Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany), provided automated analysis of cardiac, pulmonary, and musculoskeletal findings, including labeling, segmenting, and measuring normal structures, as well as detecting, labeling, and measuring abnormalities.

AI-annotated images and autogenerated summary results were stored in the PACS (IMPAX 6, Agfa Healthcare, Mortsel, Belgium). Chest CT examinations were randomized using 1:1 allocation between AI-assisted and non-AI arms, then clinically interpreted using a stopwatch.

Ultimately, mean interpretation times were significantly shorter in the AI-assisted than in the non-AI arm for all three cardiothoracic radiologists. For readers combined, the mean difference was 93 seconds (95% CI, 63–123 seconds), corresponding with a 22.1% reduction in the AI-assisted arm: 20.0% and 24.2% for contrast-enhanced and non-contrast scans, respectively.

"If assistance from automated AI results can save one hour of interpretation time each day as estimated from our results," the authors of this AJR article contended, "then radiologists could devote this time to other activities, whether additional clinical tasks such as communicating findings to patients and referring physicians, or administrative, education, and research responsibilities."

For further information, visit on this link:

https://arrs.org/ARRSLIVE/Pressroom/PressReleases/AI_Saves_CT_Interpretation_Time.aspx

Tags:    
Article Source : American Journal of Roentgenology

Disclaimer: This site is primarily intended for healthcare professionals. Any content/information on this website does not replace the advice of medical and/or health professionals and should not be construed as medical/diagnostic advice/endorsement/treatment or prescription. Use of this site is subject to our terms of use, privacy policy, advertisement policy. © 2024 Minerva Medical Treatment Pvt Ltd

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News