Among locally advanced breast cancer patients, PET-CT detects more distant metastases
Canada: A recent study revealed the detection of more distant metastases with PET-CT than conventional staging in patients with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC), and also, fewer PET-CT patients received combined modality therapy.
The study, published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology, highlights the potential of PET-CT in improving staging accuracy and guiding appropriate treatment decisions for patients with locally advanced breast cancer.
● The trial involved 369 patients with invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast and TNM stage III or IIb. Participants were randomized into two groups: PET-CT and conventional staging. In the PET-CT group, 23% of patients were upstaged to stage IV breast cancer, compared to 11% in the conventional staging group.
● This difference in upstaging resulted in treatment changes for 81.3% of the upstaged PET-CT patients and 95.2% of the upstaged conventionally scanned patients.
● The study revealed that patients upstaged to stage IV breast cancer would benefit from avoiding the toxicity and adverse effects associated with aggressive combined modality therapy when the disease is incurable.
● Among patients in the PET-CT group, 81% received combined modality treatment, while 89.2% of conventionally staged patients received the same treatment. This difference suggests a potential reduction in overtreatment for patients upstaged by PET-CT.
● The study analyzed subsets of patients based on various factors. Among patients without inflammatory breast cancer, PET-CT upstaged 23% of patients, compared to 10% in the conventional staging group.
● For patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive disease, PET-CT was particularly sensitive in detecting asymptomatic stage IV disease. It was also sensitive, though to a lesser extent, for upstaging ER-negative and HER2-positive breast cancers reported Mark N. Levine, MD, MSc, of McMaster University in Hamilton, Ontario, and colleagues.
The trial raises several unanswered questions, including whether withholding multimodality therapy in patients with no clear evidence of distant metastases on conventional imaging but apparent disease on PET-CT may impact long-term outcomes. Identifying patients with limited metastatic disease who may still have a chance of cure remains a critical question.
While FDG PET-CT increases the diagnosis of de novo oligometastatic stage IV breast cancer in locally advanced cases, the optimal management of this type of cancer remains uncertain. The results of this study support the consideration of PET-CT for staging patients with clinical stage IIb (T3N0) and stage III breast cancer. The findings provide valuable evidence for implementing PET-CT in clinical practice and its impact on treatment decisions for locally advanced breast cancer patients.
The randomized trial comparing PET-CT with conventional staging for locally advanced breast cancer demonstrates that PET-CT leads to the detection of more distant metastases
and reduces the number of patients receiving combined modality therapy. The study highlights the potential of PET-CT in improving staging accuracy and optimizing treatment decisions, particularly for patients with limited metastatic disease who may benefit from a different treatment approach. Further research and long-term follow-up are needed to understand the impact of PET-CT on patient outcomes fully.
Reference:
Journal of Clinical Oncology Dayes IS, et al "Impact of18F-labeled fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography versus conventional staging in patients with locally advanced breast cancer" J Clin Oncol 2023; DOI: 10.1200/JCO.23.00249.
Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.
NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.