Can CT effectively diagnose interstitial lung disease? Study sheds light
Belgium: More research needs to be done to effectively evaluate lung abnormalities that could indicate interstitial lung disease, according to a study published in Radiology, journal of the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA).
"Further studies are needed to refine further and verify the concept of interstitial lung abnormalities and their link to the genesis and advancement of interstitial lung disease," Stijn E. Verleden from Katholieke Universiteit Leuven (KU Leuven) in Belgium and colleagues wrote.
The team noted interstitial lung abnormalities (ILAs) on lung CT scans can indicate early interstitial lung disease; however, there needs to be more clarity on the condition's histopathologic correlates to imaging results. Verleden and the research team aimed to determine the correlation between histopathologic and radiologic findings in CT-defined ILAs in human lung explants to fill this knowledge gap.
For this purpose, the researchers prospectively collected (from 2010 to 2021) explanted lungs or lobes from people with radiologically documented ILAs. These samples were air-inflated, frozen, and scanned with CT (computed tomography) and micro-CT. The lungs were subsequently cut and sampled with core biopsies. At least five samples from each lung underwent micro-CT and subsequent histopathologic assessment. Based on area-specific radiologic scoring, the authors assessed the association between radiologic and histopathologic findings.
The study included eight lung explants from six donors (median age at explantation, 71 years; four men); new donor lungs, n = 4; pre-emptive lobectomy for oncologic indications, n = 2.
Following were the study's key findings:
- Ex vivo CT showed ground-glass opacification, reticulation, and bronchiectasis.
- Micro-CT and histopathologic examination showed that lung abnormalities were frequently paraseptal and linked with fibrosis and lymphocytic inflammation.
- The histopathologic results showed varying fibrosis degrees in areas that appeared normal on CT scans.
- Regions of reticulation on CT scans generally had more significant fibrosis at histopathologic analysis.
- Vasculopathy and bronchiectasis were also often present at the histopathologic examination of lungs with ILAs.
- Fully developed fibroblastic foci were rarely observed.
The study showed direct histologic correlates of CT-defined interstitial lung abnormalities.
"The findings of the study highlight how it is difficult to effectively characterize interstitial lung abnormalities with currently used imaging techniques," Dr Jean Jeudy from the University of Maryland in Baltimore wrote in an accompanying commentary. He cautioned that the more we learn, the less we know is the case with interstitial lung abnormalities.
He noted that patients with advanced fibrosis features are at the highest risk of adverse outcomes and progression. However, even mild disease patients may have underlying fibrosis that could be missed with computed tomography. "Yet further imaging research will likely improve the diagnosis of early interstitial lung disease," he explained.
He concluded that "newer advances in scanner technology and artificial intelligence will improve imaging accuracy. With improved imaging biomarkers, the definitive goal will be to recognize which patients will develop progressive disease and why."
Reference:
Verleden SE, Vanstapel A, Jacob J, Goos T, Hendriks J, Ceulemans LJ, Van Raemdonck DE, De Sadeleer L, Vos R, Kwakkel-van Erp JM, Neyrinck AP, Verleden GM, Boone MN, Janssens W, Wauters E, Weynand B, Jonigk DD, Verschakelen J, Wuyts WA. Radiologic and Histologic Correlates of Early Interstitial Lung Changes in Explanted Lungs. Radiology. 2022 Dec 20:221145. doi: 10.1148/radiol.221145. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 36537894.
Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.
NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.