Dual-energy CT in ED linked to better diagnoses, less follow up: AJR study

Written By :  Hina Zahid
Medically Reviewed By :  Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli
Published On 2020-10-05 12:30 GMT   |   Update On 2020-10-05 12:31 GMT
Advertisement

Leesburg, VA - Researchers have found in a new study that Dual-energy CT (DECT) added value to routine interpretation of emergency department (ED) imaging studies by increasing radiologists' diagnostic confidence, leading to a reduction in downstream imaging and associated costs.Additional information acquired from the scans reduces follow-up imaging and produces cost savings. The findings of the study have been published in the American Journal of Roentgenology (AJR).

Advertisement

William D. Wong of Vancouver General Hospital and colleagues queried his institution's radiologic information system for all DECT studies performed in the ED between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2016. The team then sorted CT examinations into five body systems--head and neck, chest, abdomen and pelvis, spine, and musculoskeletal--and a board-certified radiologist, not initially involved in reading these cases, reviewed the corresponding reports for mentions of dual-energy or spectral examination as part of the study interpretation.

To determine the impact of DECT on downstream imaging, studies in which DECT was mentioned in the report were read again in a randomized double-blind manner with the mixed image datasets only, which simulate conventional CT images.

The difference between the numbers of follow-up studies recommended after conventional CT and DECT was converted into U.S. dollars via the U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Physician Fee Schedule and 2019 Current Procedural Terminology codes to estimate a projected cost benefit due to any reduction in follow-up imaging.

"Among the 3,159 cases, use of dual energy or spectral analysis potentially altered management in 298 (9.4%) cases, resulted in confirmation of suspected observations and increased diagnostic confidence in 455 (14.4%) cases, provided relevant additional information on an observation in 174 (5.5%) cases, resulted in characterization of an incidental finding in 44 (1.4%) cases, and was mentioned as being noncontributory in three (0.09%) cases." Wong et al. determined.

In terms of the five body systems they categorized, the musculoskeletal system accounted for the greatest number of studies wherein DECT potentially altered management (266/298 cases)--the most common use to confirm gout (185/266).

And although DECT was not noted in 2,272 reports (71.9%), compared with conventional CT alone, DECT findings avoided 162-191 recommended follow-up MRI examinations, 21-28 CT examinations, and 2-25 ultrasound examinations.

Meanwhile, DECT findings did prompt one additional recommended interventional angiography procedure, one ventilation-perfusion scan, and one imaging-guided biopsy.

Ultimately, for the Vancouver General ED in the year 2016, "DECT findings led to a decrease in recommended follow-up imaging examinations totaling an estimated $52,991.53-61,598.44," Wong and colleagues concluded.

Acknowledging a future need to evaluate how referring clinicians adapt to DECT, as well as how much they trust any added value, the authors of this AJR article added that Vancouver General has since completed the implementation of DECT acquisition for all CT examinations performed in the ED.

https://www.ajronline.org/doi/10.2214/AJR.19.22357

Tags:    
Article Source : American Journal of Roentgenology

Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.

NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News