FAPI-PET predicts concurrent chemoradiotherapy response in esophageal cancer patients: Study
China: Positron emission tomography (PET) imaging with a fibroblast activation protein inhibitor (FAPI) radiotracer may predict if esophageal cancer patients will respond to chemotherapy, a recent study in the Journal of Nuclear Medicine has stated.
The study found that a higher baseline TBRblood on 18F-FAPI-04 PET/CT scans was linked with poor response to concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (LA-ESCC) and thus, TBRblood could be helpful to improve treatment planning.
The prospective study by Xinying Hu, Shandong First Medical University, Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, Shandong, China, and colleagues was conducted to determine whether imaging results obtained through the tracer [18F] AlF-NOTA FAPI-04 (denoted as 18F-FAPI-04) in PET/CT can predict short-term outcomes in LA-ESCC patients treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy.
The study enrolled 18 LA-ESCC patients who underwent 18F-FAPI-04 PET/CT scanning before CCRT. The following parameters were recorded: - metabolic tumor volume, the maximum, mean, and peak standard uptake values (SUVmax, SUVmean, and SUVpeak), and total lesion FAP expression. Additionally, measuring SUVmean of normal tissue (muscle and blood) and SUVmax of the primary tumor was done, and their ratios were represented as target-to-background ratios (TBRmuscle and TBRblood). Patients were categorized per the RECIST criteria as responders or non-responders, and SUVs were compared between the two groups.
The study led to the following findings:
- Non-responders had significantly higher TBRblood, TBRmuscle, and SUVmean than responders.
- TBRblood (area under the curve [AUC]=0.883), TBRmuscle (AUC=0.896), and SUVmean (AUC=0.870) were identified as significant predictors of the CCRT response, with respective cutoff values of 10.68, 10.95 and 6.88.
- For TBRblood, specificity, sensitivity, negative predictive value, positive predictive value, and accuracy respectively were 72.7%, 100.0%, 88.9%, 66.7%, and 77.8%; for TBRmuscle it was 72.7%, 100.0%, 88.9%, 66.7%, and 77.8%, and SUVmean 81.8%, 85.7%, 90.0%, 75.0%, and 83.3%, respectively.
- TBRblood, TBRmuscle, SUVmean, and tumor sites were significantly correlated with the short-term outcome, as shown by univariate logistic regression analysis.
- On multivariable logistic regression analysis, TBRblood was an independent prognostic factor for short-term outcomes.
"The findings suggest that pretreatment F-18 FAPI-04 PET/CT combined with clinical prognostic factors could be developed as an approach to help determine that chemotherapy would be beneficial in patients," the researchers wrote in their study.
"18F-FAPI-04 PET/CT may offer a standardized and reproducible technique for LA-ESCC patients identification who are most likely to respond to chemotherapy," they concluded.
Reference:
Hu X, Zhou T, Ren J, Duan J, Wu H, Liu X, Mu Z, Liu N, Wei Y, Yuan ST. Response prediction using 18F-FAPI-04 PET/CT in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy. J Nucl Med. 2022 Oct 13:jnumed.122.264638. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.122.264638. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 36229183.
Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.
NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.