Lung Ultrasound helps achieve faster resolution of congestion in acute heart failure

Written By :  Dr Sravan Kumar
Medically Reviewed By :  Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli
Published On 2021-08-19 04:00 GMT   |   Update On 2021-08-19 10:12 GMT

Acute heart failure (AHF) is known to be associated with poor in-hospital and post discharge outcomes. Although no initial management strategy improves outcome in such patients, initial goal of care is to address pulmonary congestion. Measurement of lung B lines by ultrasound provides semi quantitative assessment of pulmonary congestion but the response of these B lines to diuretic therapy is...

Login or Register to read the full article

Acute heart failure (AHF) is known to be associated with poor in-hospital and post discharge outcomes. Although no initial management strategy improves outcome in such patients, initial goal of care is to address pulmonary congestion. Measurement of lung B lines by ultrasound provides semi quantitative assessment of pulmonary congestion but the response of these B lines to diuretic therapy is not well described in the literature.

Peter S. Pang et.al, conducted a randomized controlled, single-blind trial to determine if a 6-h lung ultrasound (LUS)-guided management improves pulmonary congestion over usual management guided solely by clinical reassessment in emergency setting. A secondary goal was to explore whether early targeted intervention leads to improved outcomes

This study was conducted across 4 centers in United States and included adult patients, with a history of HF, shortness of breath, and having at least one sign or radiographic evidence of AHF. Patients were required to have >15 B-lines in both hemithoraces on imaging. A total of 130 patients were randomized in 1:1 fashion.

The total number of B lines per patient at 6 hours was similar in both the groups. No differences were observed between treatment arms regarding length of hospital stay or days alive and out of hospital (DAOOH) at 30 days. A significantly greater reduction in the number of B-lines was observed in the LUS- guided arm than in the usual care arm during the first 48 hours, suggesting that LUS-guided patients had faster resolution of congestion. By the time of discharge, this difference in B-line reduction between the 2 arms was no longer significant.

Although protocol-driven treatment stopped at 6 h, repeat dosing during this interval was more common in the LUS-guided arm. This suggests that protocol-driven therapy might facilitate a more rapid reduction in congestion. Persistence of B-lines pre-discharge identifies patients at higher risk for worse outcomes.

Authors concluded saying that targeting pulmonary congestion with LUS did not show any significant decrease in pulmonary congestion within 6 hours compared with usual standard care. However, a consistent numeric reduction in pulmonary congestion, as measured by B-lines, in the intervention group was observed during hospitalization, suggesting that future work targeting B-line reduction throughout hospitalization is warranted.

Source:JACC heart failure journal

Tags:    
Article Source : JACC heart journal

Disclaimer: This site is primarily intended for healthcare professionals. Any content/information on this website does not replace the advice of medical and/or health professionals and should not be construed as medical/diagnostic advice/endorsement/treatment or prescription. Use of this site is subject to our terms of use, privacy policy, advertisement policy. © 2024 Minerva Medical Treatment Pvt Ltd

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News