Microconvex probes provide more reliable outcomes in newborns undergoing lung USG: Study
A new study by Lukas Aichhorn and team unveiled that the linear probe performs better with the microconvex probe than echo probes for lung ultrasonography in newborns. The findings of this study were published in the recent issue of journal of PLOS ONE.
In recent years, lung ultrasonography (LUS) has gained popularity in pediatric and neonatal critical care units. Many neonatologist performed lung ultrasound (NPLUS) protocols have been used in the regular environment to help in the identification of respiratory diseases, to provide guidance for operations like the insertion of chest tubes and for the administration of surfactants. The impact of probes used in ultrasound on lung ultrasound scores and picture quality is still unclear. As a result, this study compared the performance of three types of ultrasound probes in hemodynamically stable neonates, namely linear, microconvex and echo.
This prospective, randomized, blinded, comparative research was conducted between 2020 and 2022. The participants included were the hemodynamically stable newborns with nasal continuous positive airway pressure, a high flow nasal cannula, or no respiratory assistance. Lung ultrasonography with carried out with either an echo or a microconvex probe and the linear probe was the control. The main outcome measured was the NPLUS score. The additional outcome indicators were the number of B-lines, the thickness of the pleural line and subjective image quality. Furthermore, the association between NPLUS findings and clinical data was investigated.
Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.
NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.