POCUS superior modality for diagnosing Necrotizing fasciitis

Written By :  Aditi
Medically Reviewed By :  Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli
Published On 2023-01-09 14:30 GMT   |   Update On 2023-01-09 14:31 GMT

USA: According to a study published in the American Journal of Emergency Medicine, Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is more reliable in diagnosing Necrotizing fasciitis (NF) because it has good sensitivity and specificity. The researchers have considered using POCUS as an adjunctive tool to the initial clinical decision-making for diagnosing NF.It is already known that NF is deadly,...

Login or Register to read the full article

USA: According to a study published in the American Journal of Emergency Medicine, Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is more reliable in diagnosing Necrotizing fasciitis (NF) because it has good sensitivity and specificity. The researchers have considered using POCUS as an adjunctive tool to the initial clinical decision-making for diagnosing NF.

It is already known that NF is deadly, and diagnosing it remains challenging. Any delay in diagnosis increases the risk of mortality, rapid rate of tissue necrosis and higher chances of sepsis.

The skin signs can be subtle in the early course of the disease, while marked redness and bullae suggest a more advanced disease.

History, physical, and Laboratory Risk Indicators for Necrotizing Fasciitis are not very sensitive.

The use of POCUS is widely increasing for the diagnosis of skin and soft tissue infections. It is even faster and more safe compared to CT.

Against the above background, a study was conducted by a team of researchers led by Amy Marks to determine POCUS accuracy for diagnosing NF. The researchers included two prospective studies and one retrospective. The study outcomes were sensitivity and specificity.

The study summary includes the following:

  • The database searched were PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, LILACS, the Cochrane databases, Google Scholar, and bibliographies of selected articles.
  • QUADAS-2 tool was used to determine quality analyses.
  • The researchers identified three papers, including 221 patients with a mean age of 57.
  • 33% of patients had NF.
  • True positive rate: 33% (73 of 221 patients).
  • The sensitivity range was 85.4%–100%.
  • The specificity range was 44.7% to 98.2%.
  • The most sensitive was Fluid accumulation along the fascial plane, 85.4 %.
  • The most specific was subcutaneous emphysema, 100%.

To conclude, POCUS has good sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing NF.

The study’s limitations were few studies, study differences prevented meta-analysis, all studies used convenience samples, raising the risk for selection bias and blinding was poorly reported.

Further reading:

Marks, Amy, et al. “Ultrasound for the Diagnosis of Necrotizing Fasciitis: A Systematic Review of the Literature.” The American Journal of Emergency Medicine, vol. 65, Elsevier BV, Mar. 2023, pp. 31–35. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2022.12.037.

Tags:    
Article Source : American Journal of Emergency Medicine

Disclaimer: This site is primarily intended for healthcare professionals. Any content/information on this website does not replace the advice of medical and/or health professionals and should not be construed as medical/diagnostic advice/endorsement/treatment or prescription. Use of this site is subject to our terms of use, privacy policy, advertisement policy. © 2024 Minerva Medical Treatment Pvt Ltd

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News