Postoperative Radioiodine not beneficial in Low-Risk Thyroid Cancer patients: ESTIMABL2 Trial
France: A recent study has found that a non-radioiodine follow-up strategy is non-inferior to postoperative radioactive iodine (131I) treatment in patients with low-risk differentiated thyroid cancer. The study was published online in The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology on November 22, 2024.
"The group that did not receive radioactive iodine had a 93.2% event-free rate, while the 131I group had a slightly higher rate of 94.8%. These results demonstrate that withholding radioactive iodine after surgery did not negatively affect patient outcomes, offering a less invasive approach that enhances overall management," the researchers reported.
The ESTIMABL2 trial, a multicenter randomized phase 3 study involving patients with low-risk differentiated thyroid cancer (pT1am or pT1b, N0 or Nx), demonstrated the non-inferiority of a follow-up strategy that excluded radioactive iodine (131I) administration compared to postoperative 131I treatment after 3 years of follow-up. The study author Prof Sophie Leboulleux, University Paris-Saclay, Paris, France, and colleagues present the results of a pre-specified analysis conducted after 5 years of follow-up.
For this purpose, the researchers randomly assigned patients who underwent total thyroidectomy with or without prophylactic neck lymph node dissection and had no postoperative suspicious findings on neck ultrasonography to either the no-radioiodine group or the radioiodine group (1.1 GBq-30 mCi of radioactive iodine after recombinant human thyrotropin-stimulating hormone). Follow-up included annual thyroglobulin and thyroglobulin antibody measurements during levothyroxine treatment, along with neck ultrasonography in odd-numbered years.
An event was defined as abnormal 131I uptake on a post-treatment whole-body scan requiring additional treatment, abnormal neck ultrasonography, elevated thyroglobulin levels, rising thyroglobulin antibody titres, or a combination. Non-inferiority was established if the proportion of patients without an event in one group compared to the other at 5 years post-randomization differed by no more than -5%, and the confidence interval did not overlap this threshold.
Key findings:
- A total of 776 patients were enrolled in the study, with 642 (82.7%) female and 134 (17.3%) male participants. The median age was 52.9 years.
- Of the enrolled patients, 698 were evaluable at 5 years.
- The proportion of patients without events was 93.2% in the no-radioiodine group and 94.8% in the radioiodine group, resulting in a difference of –1.6%.
- Events included 11 cases of structural or functional abnormalities and 31 cases of biological abnormalities.
"The non-inferiority of a follow-up strategy, compared to postoperative 131I administration, in low-risk thyroid cancer, previously demonstrated at 3 years, was reaffirmed at 5 years. This confirms that there is no disadvantage in managing these patients without postoperative ablation," the researchers concluded.
Reference:
Leboulleux S, Bournaud C, Chougnet CN, Lamartina L, Zerdoud S, Do Cao C, Catargi B, Dygai I, Kelly A, Barge ML, Vera P, Rusu D, Schneegans O, Roux J, Raymond P, Benisvy D, Eberle MC, Bidault S, Nascimento C, Bastie D, Giraudet AL, Bardet S, Le Moullec N, Roudaut N, Drui D, Godbert Y, Zalzali M, Drutel A, Morel O, Velayoudom FL, Al Ghuzlan A, Schlumberger M, Buffet C, Borget I. Thyroidectomy without radioiodine in patients with low-risk thyroid cancer: 5 years of follow-up of the prospective randomised ESTIMABL2 trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2024 Nov 22:S2213-8587(24)00276-6. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(24)00276-6. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 39586309.
Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.
NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.