'You are Virtually Bankrupt': Delhi HC slams AAP Govt for refusing Centre's Health Aid
New Delhi: The Delhi High Court on Wednesday raised serious concerns over the Delhi government's refusal to accept healthcare funding from the centre through its Ayushman Bharat Pradhan Mantri Jan Arogya Yojana (AB-PMJAY) amid its struggling health infrastructure.
According to a PTI report, a bench of Chief Justice Manmohan and Justice Tushar Rao Gedela said it was "strange" that the Delhi government was not accepting Centre's aid when there was "no money" with it for its healthcare system.
"You may have difference of opinion but in this case you are refusing aid.. None of your machines are working. The machines have to work but you have no money actually," it said.
CJ Manmohan went ahead to remark, "Today you are refusing Rs 5 lakh for the citizens. I am shocked."
Also Read:PMJAY Beneficiaries Death Row: Khyati Hospital among 7 suspended from Ayushman Bharat
Seven BJP MPs have moved the High Court to direct the AAP government to implement the Ayushman Bharat Pradhan Mantri Jan Arogya Yojana (AB-PMJAY).
The lawmakers, in their PIL, said Delhi was the only union territory where the beneficial healthcare scheme for the underprivileged was yet to be implemented, therefore, depriving them of the essential health coverage of Rs 5 lakh.
"I have been saying openly in court that you are virtually bankrupt..your health minister and health secretary are not talking to each other. In that sort of a mess you are not not accepting central aid," CJ Manmohan remarked further, news agency PTI reported.
The hearing has been posted on November 28 to enable the Delhi government standing counsel to go through the plea which he said seemed to be "misconceived".
The court said the central scheme was just an aid being given to a particular segment of citizens and steps must be taken to iron out the differences within the Delhi administration.
It also expressed its anguish over the non-completion of several upcoming hospitals due to lack of funds with the city government.
The court said it was getting petitions by legislators everyday with respect to their grievances allegedly not being addressed which was "not good".
The petitioners -- Harsh Malhotra, Ramvir Singh Bidhuri, Praveen Khandelwal, Yogendra Chandolia, Manoj Tiwari, Kamaljeet Sehrawat and Bansuri Swaraj -- argued citizens in the national capital were facing a serious issue of high out-of-pocket health and medical expenses and several had resorted to borrowing or selling assets in a medical emergency.
Swaraj appeared in court on behalf of the petitioners.
Stating "clash of political ideologies must take a back seat" in the interest of welfare of the residents of Delhi, the petitioners sought the Delhi government to implement the scheme.
"Of 36 states/UTs, 33 have implemented the scheme and at present the government of Odisha is actively considering the implementation of the scheme. However, the scheme has not been implemented in NCT of Delhi uniquely and arbitrarily depriving the target beneficiaries of the easy and efficient access to a promised cover of Rs 5 lakh which would protect them from the catastrophic expenditure in secondary and tertiary care hospitalisation across a vast network of empanelled public and private hospitals," the petition claimed.
The plea alleged that former Delhi finance minister Manish Sisodia in his budget speech for FY 2020-2021, made a "categorical commitment" with respect to the implementation of the scheme but the promise was "arbitrarily and unreasonably" rendered ineffective.
"It is evident that a power struggle exists between the government of the NCT of Delhi and the Central government. Amid this conflict, respondent number 1 (Delhi government) has failed in its fundamental responsibility to ensure improved public health infrastructure, including hospitals and dispensaries, for the citizens," it added.
Also Read:Cabinet approves Rs 5 lakh health cover for senior citizens 70 and above under Ayushman Bharat
Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.
NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.