Among pediatric renal tumor patients, Robot-assisted resection feasible, safe with less surgical trauma: Study

The inclusion criteria enrolled in this study was unilateral tumors with maximum tumor diameter less than 10 cm. Patients who had enlarged lymph node, venous thrombosis, preoperative tumor rupture, bilateral renal tumor, or extrarenal extension on imaging were deemed contraindications and excluded. Patient demographics, operative details, postoperative outcomes and follow-up were recorded. Results: Among these patients, 17 underwent RAS and 6 underwent LAS.

In the RAS group, the median age was 64 months (range, 9–156) with a median weight of 19.48 kg (range, 8.4–46.5); the maximum tumor diameter at operation was 55.65 mm (range, 22–88); the operation time was 188.8 min (range, 120–210), the intraoperative blood loss was 20 ml (range, 5–50), and the length of postoperative hospital stay was 4 days (range 1–9).

There was no significant difference in patients’ age, weight, location, tumor size, histological pattern and operation time between the two groups (P > 0.05). The RAS group had a significantly less intraoperative blood loss (P = 0.026) and less length of postoperative stay (P = 0.01) than the LAS group. The initial experience suggested that RAS in pediatric renal tumor was feasible and safe, and it reduced surgical trauma and accelerate postoperative recovery for the patients. Due to the limitations of sample size and study quality, the clinical importance of these findings still needs to be further verified.

Reference:

He, M., Liu, S., He, Z. et al. Robot-assisted resection of renal tumor in children and comparison with laparoscopic surgery. BMC Surg 24, 325 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-024-02625-7