FMEA may Effectively Identify and Mitigate Risks in ZAP-X Radiosurgery System Implementation, reveals Study
New Delhi: A recent study revealed that the FMEA (Failure Modes and Effects Analysis) technique is highly successful in anticipating and mitigating risks while implementing cutting-edge medical technology such as the ZAP-X Radiosurgery System.
The study published online in Apollo Medicine highlighted that the FMEA approach identified a wide range of risks, from operational challenges with the equipment to issues in patient treatment, showcasing the complexities of integrating new technologies into the healthcare system.
The ZAP-X Gyroscopic Radiosurgery System is a safe, efficient, and precise technology for non-invasive stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in brain and neck conditions like tumors, lesions, and neurological conditions, minimizing radiation exposure while protecting healthy tissues.
As clinical equipment and processes become more complex, the risk of failures increases. Predicting these failures helps prevent or reduce their impact using available risk management tools. One useful management tool is Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA), which helps identify, assess, and prioritise the impact and likelihood of potential failures.
Mentioning the significant implications of the study Dr Libin K. Babu, the lead author of the study told medical dialogues, “Using ZAP -X means a safer setting with less dangers for both patients and staff when using the equipment and receiving treatment. By lowering errors and preventing downtime, it increases operational efficiency for hospitals. Globally, it provides a useful foundation that other Healthcare institutions can use to safely implement innovative technologies like ZAP-X. It serves as a guide for incorporating innovation without sacrificing dependability or safety.”
The lead author also addressed the limitations and Future Research associated with the study, he said, “We focused on the implementation at a single hospital, so while the findings are comprehensive, they might not apply universally to other institutions with different workflows or resources. Additionally, our study anticipates risks, but there’s always a possibility of unforeseen challenges in real-world use. I think further multicenter studies are needed in the future to confirm our findings in other clinical contexts.”
Reference: Babu LK, Kumar S, Nayak Y, Malani A. Risk Assessment of ZAP-X→ Radiosurgery System in a Quaternary Care Hospital Using FMEA Approach. Apollo Medicine. 2024;0(0). doi:10.1177/09760016241278899
Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.
NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.