Laparoscopic antireflux surgery effective treatment for GERD over more than 20 years

Written By :  Niveditha Subramani
Medically Reviewed By :  Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli
Published On 2023-08-23 04:00 GMT   |   Update On 2023-08-23 08:52 GMT
Advertisement

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), is a very common gastrointestinal disease affecting millions of individuals worldwide, with a significant economic impact and loss of quality of life. Laparoscopic antireflux surgery (LARS) is widely used medical treatment in treating GERD with or without hiatal hernia (HH) replacing open fundoplication.

The current study in Journal Of Gastrointestinal Surgery examined the durability of laparoscopic fundoplication based on a follow-up of at least 20 years in a cohort of consecutive patients treated with LARS for GERD and/or large HH at a national referral center for esophageal diseases.

Advertisement

The present study is one of the largest population study to have been followed up for more than 20 years and indicates a success rate of 80.4% among uncomplicated GERD patients and 63.3% among patients with large HH found that laparoscopic antireflux surgery is effective and durable for more than 20 years in patients.

The researchers performed a retrospective study with prospectively collecting data on all patients who underwent laparoscopic fundoplication for GERD and/or large HH at the Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences, University of Padova (Italy), between 1992 and 2001. Patients were divided into two groups: (i) a GERD group comprising patients with abnormal exposure of the distal esophagus to gastric acid detected on pH monitoring, with or without type I sliding HH (<1/3 of the stomach herniated in the chest); and (ii) an HH group comprising patients with > 1/3 of the stomach herniated in the chest: paraesophageal (type II), mixed (type III) or complex (type IV) HH. Patients treated with concurrent Collis gastroplasty, those who had upper GI surgery for other diseases.

The key findings of the study are

• A total of 215 patients underwent LARS at their department. Four patients (1.8%) had concomitant Collis gastroplasty and were excluded.

• During the follow-up, 4 patients (1.8%) had other upper gastrointestinal surgery (1 surgical operation for aorto-mesenteric compass syndrome, 3 sleeve gastrectomy), therefore they met exclusion criteria.

• Before completing 20 years of follow-up, 24 patients (11.2%) died for reasons not attributable to the LARS, while 41 patients (19%) were lost to follow-up.

• The study population thus consisted of 142 patients: 112 in the GERD group and 30 in the HH group. Conversion to open surgery proved necessary in 8 patients (5.6%), and intraoperative and perioperative complications were recorded in 9 (6.3%).

• At a median follow-up of 22 years (IQR: 21-24), the success rate in the study population was 76.8% (109/142): 80.3% (90/112) in the GERD group, and 63.3% (19/30) in the HH group (p=0.09).

• Gas bloat syndrome developed in 6 patients (4.2%): 5 in the GERD group, and 1 in the HH group. Revisional surgery was necessary in 14 patients (9.8%): 9 in the GERD group, and 5 in the HH group.

• After 20 years of follow-up, an overall 86.8% of patients were satisfied or very satisfied with their LARS.

Researchers concluded that “Our study demonstrated that laparoscopic antireflux surgery is effective and durable (for >20 years) in patients with uncomplicated GERD and, to a lesser extent, in those with a large hiatal hernia.”

Reference: Salvador, R., Vittori, A., Capovilla, G. et al. Antireflux Surgery’s Lifespan: 20 Years After Laparoscopic Fundoplication. J Gastrointest Surg (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-023-05797-4.

Tags:    
Article Source : Journal Of Gastrointestinal Surgery

Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.

NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News