Laparoscopic choledocholithiasis superior to ERCP for common bile duct stones after cholecystectomy

The overall efficacy rate of LCBDE was 97.1%, while the overall efficacy rate in the ERCP group was 76.6%. The LCBDE group demonstrated a significantly higher overall effective rate compared to the ERCP group, with a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05). ②The preoperative and postoperative complications of the LCBDE group were visibly lower than the other group (P < 0.05). The postoperative time to oral intake, postoperative ventilation time, length of hospital stay, and hospital costs were higher in the ERCP group compared to the LCBDE group, with a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05).

In the treatment of common bile duct stones after cholecystectomy, LCBDE is a superior choice compared to ERCP in terms of stone diameter, quantity, clearance rate, and hospital costs.

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Calculus of the common bile duct in selected participants after cholecystectomy will be removed by using endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography(ERCP) combined with sphincter of Oddi. This treatment is of obvious therapeutic effect, with a success rate of 76–97%.

Reference:

Zhang, J., Li, L., Jiang, Y. et al. Comparative analysis of laparoscopic choledocholithiasis and ERCP treatment after cholecystectomy. BMC Surg 23, 304 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-023-02207-z

Keywords:

Zhang, J., Li, L., Jiang, Y, Comparative, analysis, laparoscopic, choledocholithiasis, ERCP, treatment, after, cholecystectomy, BMC Surgery