Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy useful and safer technique for tumors of pancreatic neck

Written By :  Dr. Shravani Dali
Medically Reviewed By :  Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli
Published On 2023-10-03 04:15 GMT   |   Update On 2023-10-03 06:46 GMT

Compared with laparoscopic central pancreatectomy, Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy is a useful and safer technique for benign or low-grade malignant tumours in the pancreatic neck suggests a new study published in the Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery.Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) and laparoscopic central pancreatectomy (LCP) are two surgical methods that can remove pancreatic...

Login or Register to read the full article

Compared with laparoscopic central pancreatectomy, Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy is a useful and safer technique for benign or low-grade malignant tumours in the pancreatic neck suggests a new study published in the Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery.

Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) and laparoscopic central pancreatectomy (LCP) are two surgical methods that can remove pancreatic neck lesions. However, their benefits remain controversial. We aimed to compare the benefits and limitations of LDP and LCP.

In total, 50 patients who underwent LDP (n = 34) or LCP (n =16) between January 2014 and November 2019 were retrospectively reviewed using our database. We analyzed their preoperative characteristics, operative data, pathological features, and postoperative outcomes.

RESULTS

The baseline features of patients did not differ significantly between the two groups (P < 0.05). Compared with the LDP group, the LCP group showed significantly prolonged operation time (392 ± 144 vs. 269 ± 130 min, P = 0.007), time to oral intake (3.8 ± 1.3 vs. 2.8 ± 0.9 days, P = 0.017), and hospital stay (19.6 ± 5.1 vs. 15.4 ± 4.1 days, P = 0.008) as well as increased hospital expenses (10.1 ± 6.2 vs. 6.6 ± 1.5 WanRMB, P = 0.023). However, no significant differences were observed in conversion rate (0/16 vs. 0/34), blood loss (154 ± 93 vs. 211 ± 170 mL, P = 0.224), postoperative white blood cell count (10.3 ± 2.7 vs. 11.1 ± 3.1, P = 0.432), first random blood glucose level after operation (8.2 ± 2.1 vs. 8.6 ± 2.6 mmol/L, P = 0.696), and ascites amylase level on day 3 after operation (5212 [3110-14,176] vs. 3142 [604-13,761] U/L, P = 0.167) between the two groups. Moreover, no significant differences were noted in the incidence of postoperative diabetes (1/16 vs. 5/34) between the two groups. However, LCP was associated with significantly higher incidences of pancreatic fistula grades B and C (P = 0.005) and postoperative haemorrhage (P = 0.031).

Compared with the LCP, LDP is a useful and safer technique for benign or low-grade malignant tumours in the pancreatic neck.

Reference:

Huang, Song, et al. "Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy Versus Laparoscopic Central Pancreatectomy for Benign or Low-grade Malignant Tumors in the Pancreatic Neck." Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery, vol. 408, no. 1, 2023, p. 355.

Keywords:

Huang, Song, Laparoscopic, Distal, Pancreatectomy, Laparoscopic, Central, Pancreatectomy, Benign, Low-grade, Malignant, Tumors, Pancreatic Neck, Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery

Tags:    
Article Source : Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery

Disclaimer: This site is primarily intended for healthcare professionals. Any content/information on this website does not replace the advice of medical and/or health professionals and should not be construed as medical/diagnostic advice/endorsement/treatment or prescription. Use of this site is subject to our terms of use, privacy policy, advertisement policy. © 2024 Minerva Medical Treatment Pvt Ltd

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News