Laparoscopic surgery better than open surgery in treating perforated peptic ulcers: study

Written By :  Dr. Shravani Dali
Medically Reviewed By :  Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli
Published On 2022-07-06 14:00 GMT   |   Update On 2022-07-06 14:01 GMT

Laparoscopic surgery resulted in results in better functional recovery than open surgery in perforated peptic ulcers according to a recent study published in the BMC Surgery Perforated peptic ulcer (PPU) is a common emergency condition requiring surgery using laparoscopy or open repair of the perforated site. The aim of this study was to assess the role of laparoscopic surgery...

Login or Register to read the full article

Laparoscopic surgery resulted in results in better functional recovery than open surgery in perforated peptic ulcers according to a recent study published in the BMC Surgery

Perforated peptic ulcer (PPU) is a common emergency condition requiring surgery using laparoscopy or open repair of the perforated site.

The aim of this study was to assess the role of laparoscopic surgery (LS) based on the safety and efficacy for Perforated peptic ulcers.

Medical records of the consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery or open surgery (OS) for Perforated peptic ulcers at five hospitals between January 2009 and December 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. After propensity score matching, short-term perioperative outcomes were compared between laparoscopic surgery and open surgery in selected patients.

Results:

  • Among the 598 patients included in the analysis, open surgery was more frequently performed in patients with worse factors, including older age, a higher American Society of Anesthesiologists score, more alcohol use, longer symptom duration, a higher Boey score, a higher serum C-reactive protein level, a lower serum albumin level, and a larger-diameter perforated site.
  • After propensity score matching, 183 patients were included in each group; variables were well-balanced between groups.
  • Postoperative complications were not different between groups
  • However, postoperative length of hospital stays and postoperative time to liquid intake were shorter in the laparoscopic surgery group.

Thus, laparoscopic surgery resulted in better functional recovery than open surgery and can be safely performed for the treatment of Perforated peptic ulcers. When performed by experienced surgeons, laparoscopic surgery is an alternative option, even for hemodynamically unstable patients.

Reference:

Laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer: a multicenter, propensity score matching analysis by Chang Woo Kim et al. published in the BMC Surgery

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-022-01681-1

Keywords:

Laparoscopic, repair, perforated, peptic, ulcer, multicenter, propensity, score, matching, analysis, Chang Woo Kim, Jong Wan Kim, Sang Nam Yoon, Bo Young Oh, Byung Mo Kang, Peptic ulcer, Peptic ulcer perforation, Laparoscopy, Complication, Propensity score, BMC Surgery


Tags:    
Article Source : BMC Surgery

Disclaimer: This site is primarily intended for healthcare professionals. Any content/information on this website does not replace the advice of medical and/or health professionals and should not be construed as medical/diagnostic advice/endorsement/treatment or prescription. Use of this site is subject to our terms of use, privacy policy, advertisement policy. © 2024 Minerva Medical Treatment Pvt Ltd

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News