Neither alcoholic chlorhexidine skin preparation nor triclosan-coated sutures help prevent SSI: Study
Neither alcoholic chlorhexidine skin preparation nor triclosan-coated sutures help prevent surgical site infections according to a recent study published in The Lancet Infectious Diseases
WHO and the UK's National Institute for Health and Care Excellence recommend alcoholic chlorhexidine skin preparation and triclosan-coated sutures to prevent surgical site infections (SSIs). Existing meta-analyses that include studies at high risk of bias, combined with the recent publication of large, randomised trials, justify an updated meta-analysis of high-quality randomised controlled trials (RCTs). We aimed to test the rates of SSI according to skin preparation solutions (ie, alcoholic chlorhexidine vs aqueous povidone-iodine) and types of sutures (ie, coated vs uncoated).
In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched MEDLINE, Embase, Pubmed, and Cochrane Library databases, with no language restrictions, to identify high-quality RCTs testing either alcoholic chlorhexidine skin preparation (vs aqueous povidone-iodine) or triclosan-coated sutures (vs uncoated sutures), or both, published from database inception to Sept 1, 2021. Patients who received clean-contaminated, contaminated, or dirty surgery were included. We predefined the characteristics of a high-quality trial through an expert consensus process to develop an enhanced Cochrane risk of bias-2 tool specifically for RCTs with a primary outcome of SSI. Data were extracted from published reports. Meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model and heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic.
- Of 942 studies identified, 933 were excluded. Four high-quality RCTs were included that tested alcoholic chlorhexidine.
- No significant difference in SSI rates was noted between alcoholic chlorhexidine and aqueous povidone-iodine
- Five high-quality RCTs were included that tested triclosan-coated sutures, with no significant difference, noted between triclosan-coated and uncoated sutures
Contrary to previous meta-analyses, this study did not show a benefit from either alcoholic chlorhexidine skin preparation or triclosan-coated sutures, both of which are more expensive than other readily available alternatives. Global and national guidance should be reconsidered to remove recommendations for their routine use.
Reference:
Alcoholic chlorhexidine skin preparation or triclosan-coated sutures to reduce surgical site infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis of high-quality randomised controlled trials by National Institute of Health Research Unit on Global Surgery published in The Lancet Infectious Diseases.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(22)00133-5
Keywords:
The Lancet Infectious Diseases, Alcoholic, chlorhexidine, skin, preparation, triclosan-coated, sutures, reduce, surgical, site, infection, systematic, review, meta-analysis, high-quality, randomised controlled trials, National Institute of Health Research Unit on Global Surgery
Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.
NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.