Percutaneous sclerotherapy alternative option for treating large hepatic hemangiomas: Study

Written By :  Dr. Shravani Dali
Medically Reviewed By :  Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli
Published On 2022-05-06 03:30 GMT   |   Update On 2022-05-06 03:31 GMT

Percutaneous sclerotherapy is the preferred method for the treatment of large hepatic hemangioma over surgical resection, according to a recent study published in BMC Surgery. It is no consensus on the best management for patients with large hepatic hemangiomas. This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of percutaneous sclerotherapy compared to surgical resection...

Login or Register to read the full article

Percutaneous sclerotherapy is the preferred method for the treatment of large hepatic hemangioma over surgical resection, according to a recent study published in BMC Surgery.

It is no consensus on the best management for patients with large hepatic hemangiomas. This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of percutaneous sclerotherapy compared to surgical resection for large hepatic hemangiomas.

A total of 89 patients with large hepatic hemangiomas from a single centre underwent either percutaneous sclerotherapy (n = 14) or surgical resection (n = 75) as first-line treatment was retrospectively studied, followed up for 9–24 months using ultrasound. Terms of intraoperative and postoperative information, postoperative complications, and treatment effectiveness were compared between the two groups.

The results of the study are:

  • Percutaneous sclerotherapy had shorter operative time (p < 0.001), less blood loss, lower rate of prophylactic abdominal drainage (97.3% vs. 0%, p < 0.001), fewer minor complications (48.0% vs. 7.1%, p < 0.01), shorter hospital stay (p < 0.001), lower hospital cost (p < 0.001), higher Alb level (p < 0.001) and lower postoperative clinical index including ALT, AST and WBC (p < 0.001 for both) than did surgical resection.
  • The major complications demonstrated no significant difference between the two groups.
  • In addition, the mean maximum cross-sectional areas of hemangioma dropped from 5044.1 ± 2058.0 mm2 to 1924.6 ± 1989.5 mm2 (65.2% reduction) during 9–24 months of follow-up (p < 0.001) in the percutaneous sclerotherapy group, while all patients in the surgical resection group achieved complete response.

Thus, percutaneous sclerotherapy is the preferred method for the treatment of large hepatic hemangioma over surgical resection when compared with the items of postoperative recovery, blood loss, complications, hospital stays, and lower hospital costs. The reduction of the maximum cross-sectional area of hepatic hemangioma in the percutaneous sclerotherapy group is satisfactory.

Reference:

Ultrasound-guided percutaneous sclerotherapy versus surgical resection in the treatment of large hepatic hemangiomas: a retrospective study by Zepeng Lin, et al. published in the BMC Surgery.

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-022-01574-3

Keywords:

Ultrasound-guided, percutaneous, sclerotherapy, versus, surgical resection, treatment, large, hepatic, hemangiomas, BMC Surgery, Zepeng Lin, Xiaofeng Zhu & Jian Zhou, Hepatic hemangiomas, Percutaneous sclerotherapy, Surgical resection, Retrospective study, Clinical outcomes


Tags:    
Article Source : BMC Surgery

Disclaimer: This site is primarily intended for healthcare professionals. Any content/information on this website does not replace the advice of medical and/or health professionals and should not be construed as medical/diagnostic advice/endorsement/treatment or prescription. Use of this site is subject to our terms of use, privacy policy, advertisement policy. © 2024 Minerva Medical Treatment Pvt Ltd

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News