Perioperative Systemic Therapy safe for Resectable Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases

Written By :  MD Bureau
Medically Reviewed By :  Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli
Published On 2022-02-02 03:30 GMT   |   Update On 2022-02-02 03:30 GMT
Advertisement

The peritoneum is the second most common isolated metastatic site of colorectal cancer after the liver. Upfront cytoreductive surgery with cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) is the standard treatment for isolated resectable colorectal peritoneal metastases (PM).

In a recent study, researchers reported that perioperative systemic therapy is feasible and safe in patients diagnosed with resectable colorectal peritoneal metastases. The study findings were published in the JAMA Surgery.

Advertisement

So far, no randomized clinical trials have investigated perioperative systemic therapy relative to cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy alone for resectable colorectal peritoneal metastases (CPM). Therefore, Dr Koen P. Rovers and his team conducted a study to assess the feasibility and safety of perioperative systemic therapy in patients with resectable CPM and the response of CPM to neoadjuvant treatment.

It was an open-label, parallel-group phase 2 randomized clinical trial of 79 patients from 9 Dutch tertiary centres for the surgical treatment of CPM. They were randomized to perioperative systemic therapy (n = 37) or CRS-HIPEC (n = 42) alone. The major outcome assessed was proportions of macroscopic complete CRS-HIPEC and Clavien-Dindo grade 3 or higher postoperative morbidity. The researchers also assessed the rates of objective radiologic and major pathologic response of CPM to neoadjuvant treatment.

Key findings of the study were:

  • Upon analysis, the researchers found no significant difference in the experimental and control arms regarding the proportions of macroscopic complete CRS-HIPEC (33 of 37 [89%] vs 36 of 42 [86%] patients; risk ratio, 1.04) and Clavien-Dindo grade 3 or higher postoperative morbidity (8 of 37 [22%] vs 14 of 42 [33%] patients; risk ratio, 0.65).
  • They observed no treatment-related deaths.
  • They noted that the objective radiologic and major pathologic response rates of CPM to neoadjuvant treatment were 28% (9 of 32 evaluable patients) and 38% (13 of 34 evaluable patients).

The authors concluded, "In this randomized phase 2 trial in patients diagnosed with resectable CPM, perioperative systemic therapy seemed feasible, safe, and able to induce response of CPM, justifying a phase 3 trial."

For further information:

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamasurgery/article-abstract/2780041


Tags:    
Article Source :  JAMA Surgery

Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.

NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News