Preoperative FOLFOX as good as chemoradiotherapy for increasing survival in locally advanced rectal cancer
Preoperative FOLFOX is as good as chemoradiotherapy for increasing survival in locally advanced rectal cancer suggests a new study published in the New England Journal of Medicine.
Pelvic radiation plus sensitizing chemotherapy with a fluoropyrimidine (chemoradiotherapy) before surgery is standard care for locally advanced rectal cancer in North America. Whether neoadjuvant chemotherapy with fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) can be used in lieu of chemoradiotherapy is uncertain.
Researchers conducted a multicenter, unblinded, noninferiority, randomized trial of neoadjuvant FOLFOX (with chemoradiotherapy given only if the primary tumor decreased in size by <20% or if FOLFOX was discontinued because of side effects) as compared with chemoradiotherapy. Adults with rectal cancer that had been clinically staged as T2 node-positive, T3 node-negative, or T3 node-positive who were candidates for sphincter-sparing surgery were eligible to participate. The primary end point was disease-free survival. Noninferiority would be claimed if the upper limit of the two-sided 90.2% confidence interval of the hazard ratio for disease recurrence or death did not exceed 1.29. Secondary end points included overall survival, local recurrence (in a time-to-event analysis), complete pathological resection, complete response, and toxic effects.
RESULTS
From June 2012 through December 2018, a total of 1194 patients underwent randomization and 1128 started treatment; among those who started treatment, 585 were in the FOLFOX group and 543 in the chemoradiotherapy group. At a median follow-up of 58 months, FOLFOX was noninferior to chemoradiotherapy for disease-free survival (hazard ratio for disease recurrence or death, 0.92; 90.2% confidence interval [CI], 0.74 to 1.14; P=0.005 for noninferiority). Five-year disease-free survival was 80.8% (95% CI, 77.9 to 83.7) in the FOLFOX group and 78.6% (95% CI, 75.4 to 81.8) in the chemoradiotherapy group. The groups were similar with respect to overall survival (hazard ratio for death, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.74 to 1.44) and local recurrence (hazard ratio, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.44 to 3.16). In the FOLFOX group, 53 patients (9.1%) received preoperative chemoradiotherapy and 8 (1.4%) received postoperative chemoradiotherapy.
In patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who were eligible for sphincter-sparing surgery, preoperative FOLFOX was noninferior to preoperative chemoradiotherapy with respect to disease-free survival.
Reference:
Preoperative Treatment of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer. Deborah Schrag, M.D., M.P.H., Qian Shi, Ph.D., Martin R. Weiser, M.D., Marc J. Gollub, M.D., Leonard B. Saltz, M.D., Benjamin L. Musher, M.D., Joel Goldberg, M.D., Tareq Al Baghdadi, M.D., Karyn A. Goodman, M.D., Robert R. McWilliams, M.D., Jeffrey M. Farma, M.D., Thomas J. George, M.D., et al. N Engl J Med 2023; 389:322-334
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2303269
Keywords:
Preoperative, FOLFOX, good, chemoradiotherapy, increasing, survival, locally, advanced, rectal, cancer, the New England Journal of Medicine, Deborah Schrag, M.D., M.P.H., Qian Shi, Ph.D., Martin R. Weiser, M.D., Marc J. Gollub, M.D., Leonard B. Saltz, M.D., Benjamin L. Musher, M.D., Joel Goldberg, M.D., Tareq Al Baghdadi, M.D., Karyn A. Goodman, M.D., Robert R. McWilliams, M.D., Jeffrey M. Farma, M.D., Thomas J. George
Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.
NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.