Robotic Surgery on the Rise in Emergency Procedures: Study Shows Promising Outcomes
In a noteworthy shift in the landscape of emergency general surgery, robotic procedures are increasingly making their mark, offering potential advantages in outcomes, according to a comprehensive retrospective cohort study conducted across 829 US facilities. The study states that robotic surgery which has traditionally been associated with elective procedures, illuminates its increasing role in emergency general surgery.
The study results were published in the journal JAMA Surgery.
In the realm of surgical interventions, robotic surgery has firmly established itself as a go-to approach for a diverse array of elective operations. However, when it comes to emergency general surgery, there exists a notable gap in comprehensive data regarding the utility and outcomes of robotic procedures. Hence researchers conducted a study to understand the trajectory of robotic and laparoscopic approaches in emergency settings. Published after extensive data analysis from July 2022 to November 2023, the study delved into the utilization and outcomes of laparoscopic and robotic approaches for emergent surgical procedures, focusing on cholecystectomy, colectomy, inguinal hernia repair, and ventral hernia repair.
From 2013 to 2021, a retrospective cohort study analyzed a discharge database from 829 US facilities, covering 1,067,263 emergent surgeries. Surgical approaches (robotic, laparoscopic, or open) were assessed for temporal trends, conversion rates, and length of stay. Temporal trends were measured through linear regression, and propensity score matching compared outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic surgery groups.
Findings:
- Over the observed period from 2013 to 2021, robotic surgery exhibited a consistent year-over-year increase for all examined procedures.
- Notable percentages included a 0.7% rise for cholecystectomy, 0.9% for colectomy, 1.9% for inguinal hernia repair, and 1.1% for ventral hernia repair.
- This trend was accompanied by a corresponding decrease in the conventional open surgical approach across the board.
- Robotic surgery was associated with a significantly lower risk of conversion to open surgery in all four procedures.
- For instance, in cholecystectomy, the conversion risk was 1.7% for robotic surgery compared to 3.0% for laparoscopy.
- Similar trends were observed in colectomy, inguinal hernia repair, and ventral hernia repair, with robotic surgery consistently demonstrating lower conversion rates.
- Furthermore, the study revealed a notable advantage in postoperative lengths of stay for patients undergoing robotic surgery.
- Specifically, colectomy, inguinal hernia repair, and ventral hernia repair displayed shorter stays for the robotic surgery cohort.
- The reduced length of stay suggests a potential improvement in recovery times and resource utilization, marking a positive development for both patients and healthcare systems.
While the adoption of robotic surgery in emergency settings is not yet ubiquitous, the study underscores a growing trend and suggests promising outcomes associated with this advanced approach. As technological advancements continue to shape the field of surgery, the increasing prevalence of robotics in emergency procedures holds the potential to enhance patient outcomes and redefine standards in emergency general surgery. The findings provide valuable insights for the medical community, paving the way for further exploration of the role of robotics in emergency settings.
Further reading: Lunardi N, Abou-Zamzam A, Florecki KL, et al. Robotic Technology in Emergency General Surgery Cases in the Era of Minimally Invasive Surgery. JAMA Surg. Published online March 06, 2024. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2024.0016
Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.
NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.