Study spells Caution: Lung Ultrasound May Underdiagnose Pneumothorax Diagnoses in Trauma Cases

Written By :  Medha Baranwal
Medically Reviewed By :  Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli
Published On 2024-09-25 16:00 GMT   |   Update On 2024-09-26 07:40 GMT

USA: A recent study published online in Surgery highlights that lung ultrasound may underdiagnose clinically significant pneumothorax. The research reveals that ultrasound used during initial trauma assessments shows low sensitivity and a high rate of false negatives.

"Given that many of these false-negative results are clinically significant and necessitate thoracostomy, the researchers caution against relying solely on chest ultrasonography for pneumothorax screening."

While chest CT is considered the gold standard for diagnosing traumatic pneumothorax, supine chest X-ray and lung ultrasound are commonly utilized for quick confirmation or exclusion of this injury during initial resuscitation. Recent advancements in ultrasound technology have led some reports to suggest that its performance may rival chest X-rays. However, the reliability of ultrasound in this context remains uncertain.

Advertisement

Against the above background, Jarrett E. Santorelli, UC San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego, CA, and colleagues conducted a prospective study based on the hypothesis that chest ultrasonography would exhibit low sensitivity in detecting clinically significant pneumothorax.

For this purpose, the researchers conducted a prospective observational analysis of patients with blunt chest trauma at a level 1 trauma center. The patients underwent supine chest radiography and chest ultrasonography before any intervention, along with confirmatory computed tomography imaging. All chest ultrasounds were performed in the trauma bay by a registered sonographer, and all imaging was evaluated in real-time by an attending trauma surgeon and radiologist.

Based on the study, the following findings were made:

  • Of 2,185 patients screened with a diagnosis of blunt thoracic trauma, 1,489 patients had chest radiography, chest ultrasonography, and confirmatory computed tomography and were included for analysis.
  • Patients were 71% male, with a median age of 42 years, and a mean Injury Severity Score of 6.
  • The sensitivity of chest ultrasonography to detect pneumothorax was low.
  • Chest ultrasonography had a false negative rate of 72%, with 22% undergoing tube thoracostomy.
  • Patients with false negative examinations had lower initial O2 saturation and systolic blood pressure and were more likely to have rib fractures compared with true negative chest ultrasonography examinations.

The prospective analysis revealed that lung ultrasound has lower sensitivity for detecting traumatic pneumothorax compared to traditional supine chest X-ray when used as a screening tool for all trauma patients.

"This finding challenges recent studies that claim LUS is superior for this purpose. We recommend continuing to utilize chest X-ray and ultrasound as complementary tools in the ATLS primary survey, as their combined sensitivity is greater than that of either examination alone. Additionally, we advise caution in relying solely on sonography for screening traumatic pneumothorax," the researchers concluded.

Reference:

Santorelli, J. E., Marshall, A., Perkins, L., Adams, L., Kurth, L., Doucet, J. J., & Costantini, T. W. (2024). Lung ultrasonography underdiagnoses clinically significant pneumothorax. Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2024.08.013


Tags:    
Article Source : Surgery Journal

Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.

NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News