Three-port reduces hospital stay, analgesia need after leparoscopic cholecystectomy: Study

UK: The three-port technique versus the four-port approach for laparoscopic cholecystectomy is associated with a lower length of hospital stays, and reduced requirement of postoperative analgesia, says a recent study. The decision to use three ports, however, should not be done at the expense of the safe dissection of Calot's triangle. 

"Three-port technique could therefore be an option for appropriately trained surgeons who perform it regularly," Lawrence Nip, Department of General Surgery, University Hospital Lewisham, London, UK, and colleagues wrote in their study published in the journal BJS Open. 

For cholecystectomy, the four-port laparoscopic technique is the standard approach. Although the three-port technique has been described there is no consensus over the outcomes and efficacy of this approach. The study, therefore, was conducted with an aim to compare the three- and four-port techniques in laparoscopic cholecystectomy for benign diseases of the gallbladder in a systematic review and meta-analysis. 

The review was performed according to a predefined protocol registered on PROSPERO. An electronic database search was conducted. Outcomes are reported as risk ratios (RR), mean difference (m.d.), or standardized mean difference (s.m.d.). 

The meta-analysis included eighteen trials consisting of 2085 patients. 

"The three-port technique for laparoscopic cholecystectomy is an option for appropriately trained surgeons who perform it regularly," the authors wrote. "However, the decision to use three ports should not be at the expense of the safe dissection of Calot's triangle."

Reference:

Lawrence Nip, Kin-Seng Tong, Cynthia M. Borg, Three-port versus four-port technique for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis, BJS Open, Volume 6, Issue 2, April 2022, zrac013, https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrac013