Management of Patients with Microhematuria: AUA/SUFU guidelines

Written By :  Dr. Shravani Dali
Medically Reviewed By :  Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli
Published On 2021-08-19 03:30 GMT   |   Update On 2021-08-19 04:40 GMT
Advertisement

Recent guidelines regarding the treatment of adult patients with suspected or confirmed cases of Microhematuria were released by the American Urological Association (AUA) and Society of Urodynamics, Female Pelvic Medicine & urogenital reconstruction (SUFU) and were published in JAMA.

The prevalence of microhematuria among healthy patients ranges from 2.4% to 31.1%.1 Although 13.1% of gross hematuria episodes are associated with malignancy, only 0.3% to 6.3% of microhematuria episodes are associated with malignancy.

Characteristics of guidelines score:

The AUA and SUFU developed this guideline with representation from the American College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists and a patient advocate.

Panellists disclosed conflicts of interest and were disqualified if conflicts compromised objectivity.

Some major recommendations of the latest guidelines were:

Microhematuria should be considered to be more than 3 blood cells per high power field on microscopic evaluation of a urine specimen.

Patients with microhematuria attributed to a gynaecologic or diagnosed urologic etiology, such as urinary tract infection should have repeated urinalysis after resolution of the causative condition.

Clinicians should refer patients with microhematuria and suspected kidney disease to a nephrologist. This should not preclude a risk-based urologic evaluation.

Clinicians should categorize patients with microhematuria as at low, intermediate, and high risk of genitourinary malignancy based on risk factors.

Low-risk patients should engage in shared decision making about repeat urinalysis within 6 months or cystoscopy and kidney ultrasound. Intermediate risk patients should undergo cystoscopy and kidney ultrasound. High-risk patients should undergo cystoscopy and axial upper tract imaging.

Patients whose evaluation for microhematuria is unrevealing may have to repeat urinalysis within 12 months. Patients with persistent or recurrent microhematuria should engage in shared decision making for additional microhematuria evaluation. If subsequent urinalysis for microhematuria is negative, further evaluation may be discontinued.

Reference:

Management of Patients with Microhematuria by Judge C et. al published in the JAMA.

doi:10.1001/jama.2021.4770


Tags:    
Article Source : JAMA

Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.

NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News