Active surveillance in low risk prostate cancer patients effective management option to immediate surgery or radiation: JAMA

Written By :  Dr Riya Dave
Medically Reviewed By :  Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli
Published On 2024-05-31 22:00 GMT   |   Update On 2024-06-01 06:00 GMT
Advertisement

Researchers from Fred Hutch Cancer Center have found that active surveillance for prostate cancer patients with a low risk of progression is an effective alternative to immediate surgery or radiation to manage the disease. They found that half of men with low-risk prostate cancer remained free from progression or treatment 10 years after diagnosis when followed in a protocol-directed active surveillance program. This finding highlights the viability of active surveillance as a management strategy for favorable-risk prostate cancer, alleviating concerns about delayed treatment leading to worse outcomes. The results of the study have been published in JAMA .

Advertisement

Active surveillance has emerged as the preferred management strategy for low-grade prostate cancer, involving regular PSA exams and prostate biopsies to monitor disease progression. Despite this, only about 60% of eligible patients opt for surveillance due to fears of undertreatment and missing a window of curability. Current clinical guidelines offer limited direction on the optimal surveillance approach, necessitating further research.

The study analyzed data from the Canary Prostate Active Surveillance Study (PASS), a collaborative observational study involving 10 North American centers. Participants included 2,155 men with favorable-risk prostate cancer, enrolled from 2008 through 2022. The median age was 63, and the median follow-up period was 7.2 years. The primary endpoints were biopsy grade reclassification, treatment, metastasis, prostate cancer mortality, overall mortality, and recurrence after treatment. The key findings were as follows

• 50% of men remained free from progression or treatment at 10 years.

• 43% had biopsy grade reclassification.

• 49% underwent treatment for prostate cancer.

• 18% required treatment after confirmatory biopsy (median 1.5 years).

• 18% required treatment after subsequent biopsies (median 4.6 years).

• 5-year recurrence rate: 11% (early treatment), 8% (later treatment).

• 10-year metastasis rate: 1.4%.

• Prostate cancer-specific mortality at 10 years: 0.1%.

• Overall mortality at 10 years: 5.1%.

The study's findings support the safety and effectiveness of active surveillance for managing low-risk prostate cancer. High adherence to biopsy schedules likely contributed to the low rates of metastasis and recurrence. Notably, the Canary PASS cohort had an 88% adherence to first follow-up biopsies within 2 years of diagnosis and 97% within 5 years. These results align with the premise that regular monitoring during surveillance is a safe management strategy.

Active surveillance, involving regular PSA exams and prostate biopsies, is a safe and effective management strategy for favorable-risk prostate cancer. The study's findings suggest that delayed treatment does not lead to worse outcomes compared to earlier treatment, reinforcing the potential of active surveillance to become a widely accepted approach for managing low-risk prostate cancer.

Reference:

Newcomb, L. F., Schenk, J. M., Zheng, Y., Liu, M., Zhu, K., Brooks, J. D., Carroll, P. R., Dash, A., de la Calle, C. M., Ellis, W. J., Filson, C. P., Gleave, M. E., Liss, M. A., Martin, F., McKenney, J. K., Morgan, T. M., Tretiakova, M. S., Wagner, A. A., Nelson, P. S., & Lin, D. W. (2024). Long-term outcomes in patients using protocol-directed active surveillance for prostate cancer. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2024.6695


Tags:    
Article Source : JAMA

Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.

NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News