Initial active treatment of localised prostate cancer tied to worse Qol in long run: BMJ
Localised prostate cancer has a five year relative survival rate of nearly 100% compared with the general population; survival rates at all stages are 98% and 96% at 10 and 15 years, respectively. Consequently, it has become increasingly important to consider quality of life outcomes associated with different treatments in treatment decision making.
Patients receiving initial active treatment for localised prostate cancer had generally worse long term self-reported quality of life than men without a diagnosis of prostate cancer, suggests the findings of a recent study . Men who had external beam radiation therapy/ high dose rate brachytherapy or androgen deprivation therapy as primary treatment reported more bowel problems, and this persisted in the group receiving androgen deprivation therapy, the study further reported.
The current study was aimed at 2 outcomes- firstly, to describe long term self-reported quality of life associated with the different common treatment approaches for men with localised prostate cancer in comparison with population based controls. Secondly, to determine the extent to which previously self-reported changes in continence, potency, bowel function, and overall wellbeing at three and 10 years of follow-up were still present and problematic at 15 years.
Researchers undertook the study to assess treatment related changes in quality of life up to 15 years after diagnosis of localised prostate cancer.
The study design consisted of a Population based, prospective cohort study with follow-up over 15 years. 1642 men with localised prostate cancer, aged less than 70, and 786 controls randomly recruited from the New South Wales electoral roll into the New South Wales Prostate Cancer Care and Outcomes Study (PCOS). Main outcome measures assessed were General health and disease specific quality of life were self-reported at seven time points over a 15 year period, using the 12-item Short Form Health Survey scale, University of California, Los Angeles prostate cancer index, and expanded prostate cancer index composite short form (EPIC-26).
Data analysis revealed the following facts.
- At 15 years, all treatment groups reported high levels of erectile dysfunction, depending on treatment (62.3% (active surveillance/watchful waiting, n=33/53) to 83.0% (non-nerve sparing radical prostatectomy, n=117/141)) compared with controls (42.7% (n=44/103)).
- Men who had external beam radiation therapy or high dose rate brachytherapy or androgen deprivation therapy as primary treatment reported more bowel problems.
- Self-reported urinary incontinence was particularly prevalent and persistent for men who underwent surgery, and an increase in urinary bother was reported in the group receiving androgen deprivation therapy from 10 to 15 years (year 10: adjusted mean difference −5.3, 95% confidence interval −10.8 to 0.2; year 15: −15.9; −25.1 to −6.7).
This study strengthens the evidence for informed decision making about the early management of localised prostate cancer.
"Patients receiving initial active treatment for localised prostate cancer had generally worse long term self-reported quality of life than men without a diagnosis of prostate cancer. Men treated with radical prostatectomy fared especially badly, particularly in relation to long term sexual outcomes. Clinicians and patients should consider these long term quality of life outcomes when making treatment decisions."concluded the team.
For full article follow the link:
doi: 10.1136/bmj.m3503.
Primary source:BMJ
Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.
NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.