Orchidectomy more Cardiotoxic compared to Medical Castration in Prostate Cancer patients

Written By :  MD Editorial Team
Medically Reviewed By :  Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli
Published On 2021-12-13 03:30 GMT   |   Update On 2021-12-13 03:30 GMT

The role of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in the treatment of prostate cancer is debatable. ADT has a rapid and dramatic clinical effect in men with symptomatic metastatic prostate cancer. ADT is widely regarded as the first-line treatment for symptomatic metastatic prostate cancer. A new study discovered an increased risk of Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) in patients with...

Login or Register to read the full article

The role of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in the treatment of prostate cancer is debatable. ADT has a rapid and dramatic clinical effect in men with symptomatic metastatic prostate cancer. ADT is widely regarded as the first-line treatment for symptomatic metastatic prostate cancer.

A new study discovered an increased risk of Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) in patients with prostate cancer, particularly those undergoing surgical castration rather than Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone (GnRH) therapies.

This study was conducted by Wei-Chih Kan and team with the objective to compare the risk of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) in patients with prostate cancer who received either surgical castration or GnRH therapies. The findings of this study were published in The Journal of Urology.

From 2008 to 2017, the researchers used Taiwan Cancer Registry (TCR) and Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD) to identify 8,413 patients receiving GnRH therapies versus 694 receiving surgical castration. Following the study, the median follow-up period was three years.

The findings of this study are:

1. In patients receiving GnRH therapies or surgical castration, the crude incidences of 3-year mortality and MACCEs were 19.90% vs. 26.51% and 8.23% vs. 8.65%, respectively.

2. Despite no significant differences in MACCEs between groups after adjusting for age, cancer stage, and comorbidities, there was a slight increase in the incidence of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in patients receiving surgical castration compared to those receiving GnRH therapies.

3. The mortality adjusted hazard ratios for MACCEs and AMI were 1.11 and 1.8-fold higher in patients receiving surgical castration, respectively, than in those receiving GnRH therapies.

4. Notably, in a subgroup analysis based on cancer stage, patients with cancer stage IV had the highest risk of AMI when receiving surgical castration versus GnRH therapies.

In conclusion, The findings raise concerns about the cardiac safety of surgical castration versus GnRH therapies.

Reference:

Kan, W.-C., Hsieh, K.-L., Chen, Y.-C., Ho, C. H., Hong, C.-S., Chiang, C.-Y., Wu, N.-C., Chen, M., Shih, J.-Y., Chen, Z.-C., & Chang, W.-T. (2021). Comparison of Surgical or Medical Castration-Related Cardiotoxicity in Patients With Prostate Cancer. In Journal of Urology. Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health). https://doi.org/10.1097/ju.0000000000002340

Tags:    
Article Source : The Journal of Urology

Disclaimer: This site is primarily intended for healthcare professionals. Any content/information on this website does not replace the advice of medical and/or health professionals and should not be construed as medical/diagnostic advice/endorsement/treatment or prescription. Use of this site is subject to our terms of use, privacy policy, advertisement policy. © 2024 Minerva Medical Treatment Pvt Ltd

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News