- Home
- Medical news & Guidelines
- Anesthesiology
- Cardiology and CTVS
- Critical Care
- Dentistry
- Dermatology
- Diabetes and Endocrinology
- ENT
- Gastroenterology
- Medicine
- Nephrology
- Neurology
- Obstretics-Gynaecology
- Oncology
- Ophthalmology
- Orthopaedics
- Pediatrics-Neonatology
- Psychiatry
- Pulmonology
- Radiology
- Surgery
- Urology
- Laboratory Medicine
- Diet
- Nursing
- Paramedical
- Physiotherapy
- Health news
- Fact Check
- Bone Health Fact Check
- Brain Health Fact Check
- Cancer Related Fact Check
- Child Care Fact Check
- Dental and oral health fact check
- Diabetes and metabolic health fact check
- Diet and Nutrition Fact Check
- Eye and ENT Care Fact Check
- Fitness fact check
- Gut health fact check
- Heart health fact check
- Kidney health fact check
- Medical education fact check
- Men's health fact check
- Respiratory fact check
- Skin and hair care fact check
- Vaccine and Immunization fact check
- Women's health fact check
- AYUSH
- State News
- Andaman and Nicobar Islands
- Andhra Pradesh
- Arunachal Pradesh
- Assam
- Bihar
- Chandigarh
- Chattisgarh
- Dadra and Nagar Haveli
- Daman and Diu
- Delhi
- Goa
- Gujarat
- Haryana
- Himachal Pradesh
- Jammu & Kashmir
- Jharkhand
- Karnataka
- Kerala
- Ladakh
- Lakshadweep
- Madhya Pradesh
- Maharashtra
- Manipur
- Meghalaya
- Mizoram
- Nagaland
- Odisha
- Puducherry
- Punjab
- Rajasthan
- Sikkim
- Tamil Nadu
- Telangana
- Tripura
- Uttar Pradesh
- Uttrakhand
- West Bengal
- Medical Education
- Industry
Clinical trials in India to be more legal friendly: ISCR
A body of experts has cleared the major hurdles for clinical trials in India, and also, relaxed the compensation to be given to the trial subjects in accordance with the severity of their injury
The expert committee from Indian Society for Clinical Research (ISCR) has recently stated the new compensation rules have been set to encourage clinical trials in India. This development is in interest of clearing the legal hurdles for the sponsors, and at the same time ensuring a safe process for doing clinical trials in India. The scope of discussion also highlighted the focus of ISCR to do more trials for diseases, the cure for which is not yet available in India.
The earlier guidelines had no cap for compensating the patient (trial subject); the medical management had to provide him or her irrespective of the causality suffered. To further encourage the sponsors, the guidelines have been eased and the patient will now be commensurate in line with the severity of the injury.
As reported by PTI,
Y K Gupta, professor and head of department of pharmacology at AIIMS and executive council member, ISCR, said, there were some trials in the past, which "went wrong" and since then the government has taken "correctional measures" in the regulations.
"Compensation guidelines are balanced and ensure safety of patients, and the compensation offered would be based on the severity of the injury if any sustained by the patient during the course of the trial.
"All institutional ethical committees for the trials have to be accredited and no trial can be conducted without the informed consent of a patient," Gupta said.
He said that the amendment has added the provision of "recording and archiving" the interaction with the patient for future references.
President, Indian Society for Clinical Research (ISCR), Suneela Thatte said, "some of the sponsors (individual, company etc) over the period have been unwilling to participate, because of unpredictability in review process of their application to begin trials."
"The process takes long time and now the amendment to the rules seek to bring in more predictable review timeline, steps which will encourage sponsors to participate in the trials," she said.
"We therefore have cleared major hurdles in making clinical trial in India more streamlined and there are only operational challenges now, like the right number of trials, etc," she added.
The expert committee from Indian Society for Clinical Research (ISCR) has recently stated the new compensation rules have been set to encourage clinical trials in India. This development is in interest of clearing the legal hurdles for the sponsors, and at the same time ensuring a safe process for doing clinical trials in India. The scope of discussion also highlighted the focus of ISCR to do more trials for diseases, the cure for which is not yet available in India.
The earlier guidelines had no cap for compensating the patient (trial subject); the medical management had to provide him or her irrespective of the causality suffered. To further encourage the sponsors, the guidelines have been eased and the patient will now be commensurate in line with the severity of the injury.
As reported by PTI,
Y K Gupta, professor and head of department of pharmacology at AIIMS and executive council member, ISCR, said, there were some trials in the past, which "went wrong" and since then the government has taken "correctional measures" in the regulations.
"Compensation guidelines are balanced and ensure safety of patients, and the compensation offered would be based on the severity of the injury if any sustained by the patient during the course of the trial.
"All institutional ethical committees for the trials have to be accredited and no trial can be conducted without the informed consent of a patient," Gupta said.
He said that the amendment has added the provision of "recording and archiving" the interaction with the patient for future references.
President, Indian Society for Clinical Research (ISCR), Suneela Thatte said, "some of the sponsors (individual, company etc) over the period have been unwilling to participate, because of unpredictability in review process of their application to begin trials."
"The process takes long time and now the amendment to the rules seek to bring in more predictable review timeline, steps which will encourage sponsors to participate in the trials," she said.
"We therefore have cleared major hurdles in making clinical trial in India more streamlined and there are only operational challenges now, like the right number of trials, etc," she added.
Meghna A Singhania is the founder and Editor-in-Chief at Medical Dialogues. An Economics graduate from Delhi University and a post graduate from London School of Economics and Political Science, her key research interest lies in health economics, and policy making in health and medical sector in the country. She is a member of the Association of Healthcare Journalists. She can be contacted at meghna@medicaldialogues.in. Contact no. 011-43720751
Next Story