- Home
- Medical news & Guidelines
- Anesthesiology
- Cardiology and CTVS
- Critical Care
- Dentistry
- Dermatology
- Diabetes and Endocrinology
- ENT
- Gastroenterology
- Medicine
- Nephrology
- Neurology
- Obstretics-Gynaecology
- Oncology
- Ophthalmology
- Orthopaedics
- Pediatrics-Neonatology
- Psychiatry
- Pulmonology
- Radiology
- Surgery
- Urology
- Laboratory Medicine
- Diet
- Nursing
- Paramedical
- Physiotherapy
- Health news
- Fact Check
- Bone Health Fact Check
- Brain Health Fact Check
- Cancer Related Fact Check
- Child Care Fact Check
- Dental and oral health fact check
- Diabetes and metabolic health fact check
- Diet and Nutrition Fact Check
- Eye and ENT Care Fact Check
- Fitness fact check
- Gut health fact check
- Heart health fact check
- Kidney health fact check
- Medical education fact check
- Men's health fact check
- Respiratory fact check
- Skin and hair care fact check
- Vaccine and Immunization fact check
- Women's health fact check
- AYUSH
- State News
- Andaman and Nicobar Islands
- Andhra Pradesh
- Arunachal Pradesh
- Assam
- Bihar
- Chandigarh
- Chattisgarh
- Dadra and Nagar Haveli
- Daman and Diu
- Delhi
- Goa
- Gujarat
- Haryana
- Himachal Pradesh
- Jammu & Kashmir
- Jharkhand
- Karnataka
- Kerala
- Ladakh
- Lakshadweep
- Madhya Pradesh
- Maharashtra
- Manipur
- Meghalaya
- Mizoram
- Nagaland
- Odisha
- Puducherry
- Punjab
- Rajasthan
- Sikkim
- Tamil Nadu
- Telangana
- Tripura
- Uttar Pradesh
- Uttrakhand
- West Bengal
- Medical Education
- Industry
Doctor not essential to run basic pathology labs: Health Ministry directs implementation
"For basic composite laboratory, wherever the interpretation of the medical report is required, the same is to be signed by a qualified registered medical practitioner having minimum MBBS degree and the reports which contain only numerical value/result of the test/technical analysis of samples, then signing of the report by MBBS doctors may not be essential."
New Delhi: Doctors would no longer be a necessary component for running a basic pathology laboratory in the country. While a provision for such a policy was recently made in the Minimum Standards for Medical Diagnostic laboratories under the Clinical Establishments Act. 2010, a confirmation to the same comes in the form of a recent letter from the Director NHM, Ministry of Health directing all the states to implement the said provisions.
The letter which was recently written by the Additional Secretary, Ministry of Health And Family Welfare as well as the Mission Director, National Health Mission to the Principal Secretaries, Health in all states and UTs clarifies the stand of the government in the light of implementation of Supreme Court order in the matter of North Gujarat unit of association of self-employed owners (paramedical) of private pathology laboratories of Gujarat versus North Gujarat pathologists association regarding the signing of the Laboratory reports.
The letter refers to the Gazette Notification that has been published by Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, Government of India in respect of Minimum Standards for Medical Diagnostic laboratories under Clinical Establishments Act. 2010. In light the SC order, the letter clarifies the following
"States may like to implement the above as appropriate," the letter added
Medical Dialogues team had earlier reported that the central government's Gazette notification on path lab rules had indeed become a bone of contention between the medical professionals and the government. As per the new rules, for running small labs, the presence of doctors would not be mandatory, as the manpower requirement for authorized signatory being MCI recognized doctors in such labs has only been kept as desired, not essential
Alleging that this will allow small labs to be run by nondoctors, will finally promote more quackery in laboratory medicine and will lead to mushrooming of illegal labs in the country, doctors have pointed out that the new rules will eventually put the patient at risk and dilute of the overall quality of care in medical services.
Read Also: Doctor NOT essential to run Small path labs: Health ministry Gazette
New Delhi: Doctors would no longer be a necessary component for running a basic pathology laboratory in the country. While a provision for such a policy was recently made in the Minimum Standards for Medical Diagnostic laboratories under the Clinical Establishments Act. 2010, a confirmation to the same comes in the form of a recent letter from the Director NHM, Ministry of Health directing all the states to implement the said provisions.
The letter which was recently written by the Additional Secretary, Ministry of Health And Family Welfare as well as the Mission Director, National Health Mission to the Principal Secretaries, Health in all states and UTs clarifies the stand of the government in the light of implementation of Supreme Court order in the matter of North Gujarat unit of association of self-employed owners (paramedical) of private pathology laboratories of Gujarat versus North Gujarat pathologists association regarding the signing of the Laboratory reports.
The letter refers to the Gazette Notification that has been published by Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, Government of India in respect of Minimum Standards for Medical Diagnostic laboratories under Clinical Establishments Act. 2010. In light the SC order, the letter clarifies the following
As per the notification(gazette), the laboratories have been classified into three categories, basic composite, medium and advanced. The reports of the medium and advanced categories are to be signed by the doctors having a Post-graduate qualification in pathology/bioÂchemistry/micro-biology/laboratory medicine or doctors having MBBS with PhD qualification in any of the above subjects.
For basic composite laboratory, wherever the interpretation of the medical report is required, the same is to be signed by a qualified registered medical practitioner having minimum MBBS degree and the reports which contain only numerical value/result of the test/technical analysis of samples, then signing of the report by MBBS doctors may not be essential.
"States may like to implement the above as appropriate," the letter added
Medical Dialogues team had earlier reported that the central government's Gazette notification on path lab rules had indeed become a bone of contention between the medical professionals and the government. As per the new rules, for running small labs, the presence of doctors would not be mandatory, as the manpower requirement for authorized signatory being MCI recognized doctors in such labs has only been kept as desired, not essential
Alleging that this will allow small labs to be run by nondoctors, will finally promote more quackery in laboratory medicine and will lead to mushrooming of illegal labs in the country, doctors have pointed out that the new rules will eventually put the patient at risk and dilute of the overall quality of care in medical services.
Read Also: Doctor NOT essential to run Small path labs: Health ministry Gazette
authorised signatorydiagnotic labsgazettehealth ministryimplementationlab reportlab report MCIlab report SClab reportslaboratoryMBBSMBBS doctorMBBS sign lab reportMCIMCI recognisedMCI registeredMDMD pathologyMedical CouncilMedical Council of IndiaMedical Mscsmedical reportMinimum qualificationministry of healthNABLpath labPATH LAB RULES DILUTEDpathology labspathology reportSCSupreme Courttechnical reportwho can sign
Meghna A Singhania is the founder and Editor-in-Chief at Medical Dialogues. An Economics graduate from Delhi University and a post graduate from London School of Economics and Political Science, her key research interest lies in health economics, and policy making in health and medical sector in the country. She is a member of the Association of Healthcare Journalists. She can be contacted at meghna@medicaldialogues.in. Contact no. 011-43720751
Next Story