- Home
- Medical news & Guidelines
- Anesthesiology
- Cardiology and CTVS
- Critical Care
- Dentistry
- Dermatology
- Diabetes and Endocrinology
- ENT
- Gastroenterology
- Medicine
- Nephrology
- Neurology
- Obstretics-Gynaecology
- Oncology
- Ophthalmology
- Orthopaedics
- Pediatrics-Neonatology
- Psychiatry
- Pulmonology
- Radiology
- Surgery
- Urology
- Laboratory Medicine
- Diet
- Nursing
- Paramedical
- Physiotherapy
- Health news
- Fact Check
- Bone Health Fact Check
- Brain Health Fact Check
- Cancer Related Fact Check
- Child Care Fact Check
- Dental and oral health fact check
- Diabetes and metabolic health fact check
- Diet and Nutrition Fact Check
- Eye and ENT Care Fact Check
- Fitness fact check
- Gut health fact check
- Heart health fact check
- Kidney health fact check
- Medical education fact check
- Men's health fact check
- Respiratory fact check
- Skin and hair care fact check
- Vaccine and Immunization fact check
- Women's health fact check
- AYUSH
- State News
- Andaman and Nicobar Islands
- Andhra Pradesh
- Arunachal Pradesh
- Assam
- Bihar
- Chandigarh
- Chattisgarh
- Dadra and Nagar Haveli
- Daman and Diu
- Delhi
- Goa
- Gujarat
- Haryana
- Himachal Pradesh
- Jammu & Kashmir
- Jharkhand
- Karnataka
- Kerala
- Ladakh
- Lakshadweep
- Madhya Pradesh
- Maharashtra
- Manipur
- Meghalaya
- Mizoram
- Nagaland
- Odisha
- Puducherry
- Punjab
- Rajasthan
- Sikkim
- Tamil Nadu
- Telangana
- Tripura
- Uttar Pradesh
- Uttrakhand
- West Bengal
- Medical Education
- Industry
Supreme Court Allows Passive Euthanasia for Man in 13-year Vegetative State - Video
Overview
In a landmark decision, the Supreme Court has allowed the withdrawal of artificial life support for a 32-year-old man who has been in a permanent vegetative state (PVS) for nearly 13 years. The court permitted the withdrawal of Clinically Assisted Nutrition and Hydration (CANH) being administered to him and also urged the Central government to introduce a comprehensive law governing passive euthanasia and end-of-life care.
The bench, comprising Justices J B Pardiwala and K V Viswanathan, said all medical and legal requirements necessary to withdraw treatment had been satisfied in this case. The court noted that continued medical intervention was no longer in the patient’s best interests and directed that the treatment, including CANH, be withdrawn or withheld in accordance with proper medical and palliative care protocols.
For more details, check out the full story on the link below:
Supreme Court allows passive euthanasia, orders life support withdrawal for man in vegetative state


