- Home
- Medical news & Guidelines
- Anesthesiology
- Cardiology and CTVS
- Critical Care
- Dentistry
- Dermatology
- Diabetes and Endocrinology
- ENT
- Gastroenterology
- Medicine
- Nephrology
- Neurology
- Obstretics-Gynaecology
- Oncology
- Ophthalmology
- Orthopaedics
- Pediatrics-Neonatology
- Psychiatry
- Pulmonology
- Radiology
- Surgery
- Urology
- Laboratory Medicine
- Diet
- Nursing
- Paramedical
- Physiotherapy
- Health news
- Fact Check
- Bone Health Fact Check
- Brain Health Fact Check
- Cancer Related Fact Check
- Child Care Fact Check
- Dental and oral health fact check
- Diabetes and metabolic health fact check
- Diet and Nutrition Fact Check
- Eye and ENT Care Fact Check
- Fitness fact check
- Gut health fact check
- Heart health fact check
- Kidney health fact check
- Medical education fact check
- Men's health fact check
- Respiratory fact check
- Skin and hair care fact check
- Vaccine and Immunization fact check
- Women's health fact check
- AYUSH
- State News
- Andaman and Nicobar Islands
- Andhra Pradesh
- Arunachal Pradesh
- Assam
- Bihar
- Chandigarh
- Chattisgarh
- Dadra and Nagar Haveli
- Daman and Diu
- Delhi
- Goa
- Gujarat
- Haryana
- Himachal Pradesh
- Jammu & Kashmir
- Jharkhand
- Karnataka
- Kerala
- Ladakh
- Lakshadweep
- Madhya Pradesh
- Maharashtra
- Manipur
- Meghalaya
- Mizoram
- Nagaland
- Odisha
- Puducherry
- Punjab
- Rajasthan
- Sikkim
- Tamil Nadu
- Telangana
- Tripura
- Uttar Pradesh
- Uttrakhand
- West Bengal
- Medical Education
- Industry
States responsible for diagnostic centre pricing, referral practices: MoS Health tells Rajya Sabha

New Delhi: The Central government recently informed the Parliament that addressing excessive pricing and alleged unethical referral practices by diagnostic centres is the responsibility of the respective States and Union Territories, as “Health” is a State subject under the Constitution.
Responding to a series of questions raised by MP Shri Shaktisinh Gohil on February 10, 2026, in Rajya Sabha, regarding the pricing and regulatory oversight of diagnostic services, Minister of State for Health and Family Welfare, Smt. Anupriya Patel outlined the existing regulatory framework.
The questions asked whether Government is aware that diagnostic centres, including pathology labs, X-ray, CT scan, and MRI facilities, charge excessively and allegedly offer refferal commissions to doctors, increasing treatment costs for poor patients; whether any national regulartory mechanism exists to monitor and control pricing of diagnostic tests; if so, the details thereof and the extent of enforcement; whether Government proposes to prsecribe standard rates or bring diagnostics under a uniform pricing framework; and the steps taken to curb unetical referral practices and ensure affordable diagnostic services?
In her reply, the Minister stated that the Government of India enacted the Clinical Establishments (Registration and Regulation) Act, 2010 (CE Act), along with the Clinical Establishments (Central Government) Rules, 2012, subsequently amended in 2018 and 2020, to regulate both government and private clinical establishments. The Act mandates that clinical establishments adhere to prescribed minimum standards of services.
The CE Act is currently applicable in 19 States and Union Territories, including Arunachal Pradesh, Assam, Bihar, Jharkhand, Haryana, Himachal Pradesh, Mizoram, Rajasthan, Sikkim, Telangana, Uttarakhand, Uttar Pradesh, and UTs such as Andaman & Nicobar Islands, Chandigarh, Dadra & Nagar Haveli and Daman & Diu, Jammu & Kashmir, Ladakh, Lakshadweep, and Puducherry.
Under the CE Rules, clinical establishments are required to prominently display the rates charged for various services in both the local language and English, and to charge within the prescribed range of rates. However, the issue of determining the range of rates is currently sub-judice before the Supreme Court of India.
The Minister further clarified that States and UTs that have adopted the CE Act are responsible for its enforcement. The Act empowers district-level registering authorities, chaired by the District Collector or District Magistrate, to take action against violations, including imposing penalties and cancelling registrations. In States that have not adopted the CE Act, clinical establishments are regulated under respective State laws.
On the issue of referral commissions, the government pointed to the Indian Medical Council (Professional Conduct, Etiquette and Ethics) Regulations, 2002, which prohibit physicians from giving or receiving any commission, gift, or bonus in exchange for referring patients or diagnostic specimens. The regulations also require that diagnostic investigations be prescribed judiciously and not routinely.
Additionally, under the Free Diagnostics Service Initiative, the Centre provides financial support to States and UTs to ensure that essential pathological and radiological diagnostic services are made available free of cost at public health facilities. The response indicates that while regulatory mechanisms exist at both central and state levels, enforcement and pricing control largely remain within the domain of States and UTs.
I am a student of Journalism and Mass Communication and also a passionate writer and explorer. With a keen interest in medicine, I have joined Medical Dialogues as a Content Writer. Within this role, I curate various healthcare-related news including the latest updates on health, hospitals, and regulatory updates from NMC/DCI. For any query or information, feel free to reach out to me at editorial@medicaldialogues.in

