- Home
- Medical news & Guidelines
- Anesthesiology
- Cardiology and CTVS
- Critical Care
- Dentistry
- Dermatology
- Diabetes and Endocrinology
- ENT
- Gastroenterology
- Medicine
- Nephrology
- Neurology
- Obstretics-Gynaecology
- Oncology
- Ophthalmology
- Orthopaedics
- Pediatrics-Neonatology
- Psychiatry
- Pulmonology
- Radiology
- Surgery
- Urology
- Laboratory Medicine
- Diet
- Nursing
- Paramedical
- Physiotherapy
- Health news
- Fact Check
- Bone Health Fact Check
- Brain Health Fact Check
- Cancer Related Fact Check
- Child Care Fact Check
- Dental and oral health fact check
- Diabetes and metabolic health fact check
- Diet and Nutrition Fact Check
- Eye and ENT Care Fact Check
- Fitness fact check
- Gut health fact check
- Heart health fact check
- Kidney health fact check
- Medical education fact check
- Men's health fact check
- Respiratory fact check
- Skin and hair care fact check
- Vaccine and Immunization fact check
- Women's health fact check
- AYUSH
- State News
- Andaman and Nicobar Islands
- Andhra Pradesh
- Arunachal Pradesh
- Assam
- Bihar
- Chandigarh
- Chattisgarh
- Dadra and Nagar Haveli
- Daman and Diu
- Delhi
- Goa
- Gujarat
- Haryana
- Himachal Pradesh
- Jammu & Kashmir
- Jharkhand
- Karnataka
- Kerala
- Ladakh
- Lakshadweep
- Madhya Pradesh
- Maharashtra
- Manipur
- Meghalaya
- Mizoram
- Nagaland
- Odisha
- Puducherry
- Punjab
- Rajasthan
- Sikkim
- Tamil Nadu
- Telangana
- Tripura
- Uttar Pradesh
- Uttrakhand
- West Bengal
- Medical Education
- Industry
Ocular Ultrasonography may not Distinguish Papilledema From Pseudopapilledema: Study
Ocular Ultrasonography (OUS) is not clinically useful to distinguish papilledema from Pseudopapilledema suggests a study published in the Journal of Neuro-Ophthalmology.
A group of researchers from U.S.A conducted a study to prospectively evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of ocular ultrasonography (OUS) to distinguish papilledema from pseudopapilledema.
Forty-nine study participants, with optic disc elevation, underwent neuro-ophthalmic evaluation, Ocular Ultrasonography (OUS), fundus photography, and optical coherence tomography (OCT) of the optic nerve head at the initial and follow-up visits (≤6 months apart). Participants were classified as having papilledema if there was a change in optic nerve appearance on fundus photographs, as determined by a masked observer, between initial and follow-up visits ≤6 months apart. Ocular Ultrasonography (OUS) was considered positive when the optic nerve sheath width was >3.3 mm and the 30° test was positive. Ocular ultrasonographic findings were correlated in patients who had papilledema vs patients who had pseudopapilledema. In a subanalysis, OUS findings were also correlated with change in peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness on optical coherence tomography (OCT) of the optic nerve head between initial and follow-up visits.
The results of the study are as follows:
· Ocular Ultrasonography (OUS) was 68% (17/25) sensitive for papilledema and 54% (13/24) specific for pseudopapilledema.
· When using OCT parameters to define papilledema, the sensitivity of Ocular Ultrasonography (OUS) to diagnose papilledema decreased to 62%.
· Positive Ocular Ultrasonography (OUS) correlated with elevated opening pressure on lumbar puncture and with signs of increased intracranial pressure on MRI.
Thus, the researchers concluded that Ocular Ultrasonography (OUS) alone was less sensitive in diagnosing papilledema than previously thought. Therefore, Ocular Ultrasonography (OUS) may not be helpful in distinguishing between papilledema and pseudopapilledema.
Reference:
A study titled, "Role of Ocular Ultrasonography to Distinguish Papilledema From Pseudopapilledema" by Kolhi A et. al published in the Journal of Neuro-Ophthalmology.
doi: 10.1097/WNO.0000000000000984
Dr. Shravani Dali has completed her BDS from Pravara institute of medical sciences, loni. Following which she extensively worked in the healthcare sector for 2+ years. She has been actively involved in writing blogs in field of health and wellness. Currently she is pursuing her Masters of public health-health administration from Tata institute of social sciences. She can be contacted at editorial@medicaldialogues.in.
Dr Kamal Kant Kohli-MBBS, DTCD- a chest specialist with more than 30 years of practice and a flair for writing clinical articles, Dr Kamal Kant Kohli joined Medical Dialogues as a Chief Editor of Medical News. Besides writing articles, as an editor, he proofreads and verifies all the medical content published on Medical Dialogues including those coming from journals, studies,medical conferences,guidelines etc. Email: drkohli@medicaldialogues.in. Contact no. 011-43720751