- Home
- Medical news & Guidelines
- Anesthesiology
- Cardiology and CTVS
- Critical Care
- Dentistry
- Dermatology
- Diabetes and Endocrinology
- ENT
- Gastroenterology
- Medicine
- Nephrology
- Neurology
- Obstretics-Gynaecology
- Oncology
- Ophthalmology
- Orthopaedics
- Pediatrics-Neonatology
- Psychiatry
- Pulmonology
- Radiology
- Surgery
- Urology
- Laboratory Medicine
- Diet
- Nursing
- Paramedical
- Physiotherapy
- Health news
- Fact Check
- Bone Health Fact Check
- Brain Health Fact Check
- Cancer Related Fact Check
- Child Care Fact Check
- Dental and oral health fact check
- Diabetes and metabolic health fact check
- Diet and Nutrition Fact Check
- Eye and ENT Care Fact Check
- Fitness fact check
- Gut health fact check
- Heart health fact check
- Kidney health fact check
- Medical education fact check
- Men's health fact check
- Respiratory fact check
- Skin and hair care fact check
- Vaccine and Immunization fact check
- Women's health fact check
- AYUSH
- State News
- Andaman and Nicobar Islands
- Andhra Pradesh
- Arunachal Pradesh
- Assam
- Bihar
- Chandigarh
- Chattisgarh
- Dadra and Nagar Haveli
- Daman and Diu
- Delhi
- Goa
- Gujarat
- Haryana
- Himachal Pradesh
- Jammu & Kashmir
- Jharkhand
- Karnataka
- Kerala
- Ladakh
- Lakshadweep
- Madhya Pradesh
- Maharashtra
- Manipur
- Meghalaya
- Mizoram
- Nagaland
- Odisha
- Puducherry
- Punjab
- Rajasthan
- Sikkim
- Tamil Nadu
- Telangana
- Tripura
- Uttar Pradesh
- Uttrakhand
- West Bengal
- Medical Education
- Industry
Money spent on foreign trips of doctors cannot be claimed as expense: IT Tribunal
In what can be indeed termed as a landmark move, the Mumbai bench of the Income Tax Appellate tribunal, has taken head-on action against pharma companies, providing freebies and trips to medical practitioners to lure them to prescribe a specific medicines/formulations. As per the recent action of the tribunal, a pharma company has been disallowed to claim expenses made towards foreign trips of doctors and their spouses in its statements.
The case is that of Liva healthcare,a pharma company specializing in dermatology formulations which during the financial year 2008-09, incurred an expenditure of Rs 76.55 lakh towards overseas trips for doctors and their spouses. However, an I-T officer at the assessment stage disallowed the company to claim this as an expense, a decision, that has now been upheld by the Appellate tribunal, reports TOI
The ITAT's September 12 order observes, "The payment of overseas trips of doctors and their spouses for entertainment, by the pharma company, in lieu of expectation of getting patient referrals from doctors for its products so as to generate more business and profits, by any stretch of imagination cannot be accepted as legal.Undoubtedly it is not a fair practice and has to be termed as against the public policy."
Section 37 of the I-T Act, which is a residual section, permits a business entity to claim as a deduction revenue expenditure incurred by it, `wholly and exclusively for the purpose of the business'.However, an explanation to this section provides that expenses incurred for any purpose which is an offence or is prohibited by law shall not be deemed to have incurred for the purpose of the business.Consequently , such expenditure cannot be allowed as a deduction from taxable income adds TOI.
Impact
The case is that of Liva healthcare,a pharma company specializing in dermatology formulations which during the financial year 2008-09, incurred an expenditure of Rs 76.55 lakh towards overseas trips for doctors and their spouses. However, an I-T officer at the assessment stage disallowed the company to claim this as an expense, a decision, that has now been upheld by the Appellate tribunal, reports TOI
The ITAT's September 12 order observes, "The payment of overseas trips of doctors and their spouses for entertainment, by the pharma company, in lieu of expectation of getting patient referrals from doctors for its products so as to generate more business and profits, by any stretch of imagination cannot be accepted as legal.Undoubtedly it is not a fair practice and has to be termed as against the public policy."
Section 37 of the I-T Act, which is a residual section, permits a business entity to claim as a deduction revenue expenditure incurred by it, `wholly and exclusively for the purpose of the business'.However, an explanation to this section provides that expenses incurred for any purpose which is an offence or is prohibited by law shall not be deemed to have incurred for the purpose of the business.Consequently , such expenditure cannot be allowed as a deduction from taxable income adds TOI.
Impact
The decision while having strong implications and higher tax liability for the company, will also set a precedence for other pharma companies that "invest" in foreign trips for doctors.
For the company, with the disallowance of the expenditure, the amount will be added back to the taxable component of income of the said financial year, with the company now liable to pay tax on the said amount.
The maximum rate of income tax on companies currently is 30% plus applicable surcharge and cess.
Meghna A Singhania is the founder and Editor-in-Chief at Medical Dialogues. An Economics graduate from Delhi University and a post graduate from London School of Economics and Political Science, her key research interest lies in health economics, and policy making in health and medical sector in the country. She is a member of the Association of Healthcare Journalists. She can be contacted at meghna@medicaldialogues.in. Contact no. 011-43720751
Next Story