- Home
- Medical news & Guidelines
- Anesthesiology
- Cardiology and CTVS
- Critical Care
- Dentistry
- Dermatology
- Diabetes and Endocrinology
- ENT
- Gastroenterology
- Medicine
- Nephrology
- Neurology
- Obstretics-Gynaecology
- Oncology
- Ophthalmology
- Orthopaedics
- Pediatrics-Neonatology
- Psychiatry
- Pulmonology
- Radiology
- Surgery
- Urology
- Laboratory Medicine
- Diet
- Nursing
- Paramedical
- Physiotherapy
- Health news
- Fact Check
- Bone Health Fact Check
- Brain Health Fact Check
- Cancer Related Fact Check
- Child Care Fact Check
- Dental and oral health fact check
- Diabetes and metabolic health fact check
- Diet and Nutrition Fact Check
- Eye and ENT Care Fact Check
- Fitness fact check
- Gut health fact check
- Heart health fact check
- Kidney health fact check
- Medical education fact check
- Men's health fact check
- Respiratory fact check
- Skin and hair care fact check
- Vaccine and Immunization fact check
- Women's health fact check
- AYUSH
- State News
- Andaman and Nicobar Islands
- Andhra Pradesh
- Arunachal Pradesh
- Assam
- Bihar
- Chandigarh
- Chattisgarh
- Dadra and Nagar Haveli
- Daman and Diu
- Delhi
- Goa
- Gujarat
- Haryana
- Himachal Pradesh
- Jammu & Kashmir
- Jharkhand
- Karnataka
- Kerala
- Ladakh
- Lakshadweep
- Madhya Pradesh
- Maharashtra
- Manipur
- Meghalaya
- Mizoram
- Nagaland
- Odisha
- Puducherry
- Punjab
- Rajasthan
- Sikkim
- Tamil Nadu
- Telangana
- Tripura
- Uttar Pradesh
- Uttrakhand
- West Bengal
- Medical Education
- Industry
Intensive home treatment better than hospitalization for patients with psychiatric crisis: Lancet
Netherlands: Intensive home treatment is a safe and effective partial replacement for the traditional psychiatric crisis, suggests an article published in The Lancet Psychiatry. The treatment led to a reduction in admission days, causing patients to stay longer in their social environment, with similar clinical effects, patient satisfaction, and adverse events.
Despite the fact that de-institutionalization has been underway for decades, hospitalization followed by low-intensity outpatient care remains the standard therapy for patients experiencing an acute psychiatric crisis. As an alternative to inpatient care, intensive home treatment for patients in a severe psychiatric crisis has been devised. As a result, Jurgen Cornelis and colleagues conducted this study to assess the possibility of intensive home treatment to reduce bed days and its clinical effectiveness in comparison to standard care.
Patients between the ages of 18 and 65 were recruited from the psychiatric emergency service and psychiatric emergency wards of Amsterdam's two largest mental health institutions. Patients with at least one DSM-IV-TR or DSM-5 condition who are in a mental crisis and for whom psychiatrists have indicated or completed a clinical admission may be included. Upon first contact with the patient, trained psychiatric emergency service and hospital experts performed the automated web-based pre-randomization procedure. A seeded pseudo-random number generator assigned patients (2:1) to intense home care or standard care. After randomization, informed permission was obtained as soon as the patient was mentally capable, which was within 14 days.
Professionals and patients were not blinded to treatment because of the nature of the study. Intensive home therapy was designed in consultation with patients and family, as well as a diverse professional team, and was adapted to the nature of the crisis and the aims of patients and relatives. The primary outcome of the main analyses was the total number of admission days 12 months following randomization. Linear mixed modeling studies with constrained maximum likelihood estimation were used to assess the effect of treatment conditions on outcome measures.
The key findings of this study were as follows:
1. 246 people were enrolled in the trial between November 15, 2016, and October 15, 2018.
2. There were 111 males (45%) and 135 women (55%) in all, with a mean age of 41.01 years.
3. 85 participants (35%) and 114 (46%) of the participants were foreign-born.
4. Data about ethnicity wasn't available. After a year, the average number of days spent receiving intensive home treatment was 42,47 (SD 53,92), compared to 67,02 (SD 79,03) for treatment as usual.
5. This is a reduction of 24.55 days (SD 10,73), or 36.6%. 26 adverse events were recorded, and 23 (89%) of them involved suicide attempts.
6. There were no appreciable differences in the proportion of patients in each group who experienced a reported adverse event. Five patients took their own lives.
7. There were no treatment-related fatalities.
In conclusion, overall, researchers discovered that intense home care significantly lowers the need for acute psychiatric inpatient beds without sacrificing patient safety. In stark contrast to the high hopes for the beneficial benefits of intense home therapy, the improvement in quality of life, or treatment satisfaction, there was no difference when compared to standard care.
Reference:
Cornelis, J., Barakat, A., Blankers, M., Peen, J., Lommerse, N., Eikelenboom, M., Zoeteman, J., Van, H., Beekman, A. T. F., & Dekker, J. (2022). The effectiveness of intensive home treatment as a substitute for hospital admission in acute psychiatric crisis resolution in the Netherlands: a two-centre Zelen double-consent randomised controlled trial. In The Lancet Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2215-0366(22)00187-0
Neuroscience Masters graduate
Jacinthlyn Sylvia, a Neuroscience Master's graduate from Chennai has worked extensively in deciphering the neurobiology of cognition and motor control in aging. She also has spread-out exposure to Neurosurgery from her Bachelor’s. She is currently involved in active Neuro-Oncology research. She is an upcoming neuroscientist with a fiery passion for writing. Her news cover at Medical Dialogues feature recent discoveries and updates from the healthcare and biomedical research fields. She can be reached at editorial@medicaldialogues.in
Dr Kamal Kant Kohli-MBBS, DTCD- a chest specialist with more than 30 years of practice and a flair for writing clinical articles, Dr Kamal Kant Kohli joined Medical Dialogues as a Chief Editor of Medical News. Besides writing articles, as an editor, he proofreads and verifies all the medical content published on Medical Dialogues including those coming from journals, studies,medical conferences,guidelines etc. Email: drkohli@medicaldialogues.in. Contact no. 011-43720751