Robotic Distal Pancreatectomy outperforms Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy

Written By : Dr.Niharika Harsha B |Medically Reviewed By : Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli Published On 2022-12-09T20:00:00+05:30 | Updated On 9 Dec 2022 8:00 PM IST

A recent systematic review and meta-analysis found that Robotic distal pancreatectomy (RDP) has outperformed laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) as a promising perioperative safety and feasibility technique. The study results were published in the journal Updates in Surgery.

Robotic surgery has many advantages like three-dimensional visualization, tremor filtration, motion scaling, and better ergonomics and hence it is becoming a promising surgical method in minimally invasive pancreatic surgery. Several studies explored the benefits of RDP over LDP regarding its perioperative safety and feasibility, but no consensus has been achieved yet. Hence researchers aimed to evaluate the benefits and drawbacks of RDP and LDP for perioperative outcomes.

Also Read: Drug Review: Clarithromycin in Upper Respiratory Tract Infections

All studies comparing RDP to LDP in the PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library database were systematically reviewed by June 2022. Fix or random-effects models were used according to the heterogeneity, for the meta-analysis of perioperative outcomes. Odds ratio (OR) weighted mean differences (WMD), and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Any potential sources of high heterogeneity were explored by sensitivity. To evaluate the impact of publication bias on the pooled results a trim and fill analysis was used.

Findings:

Thirty-four studies met the inclusion criteria.
RDP was found to show higher benefits than LDP for higher spleen preservation and the Kimura method in benign and low-grade malignant tumors.
Despite its cost, the frequency of RDP cases converting to laparotomy is low, and RDP has the added advantage of shorter postoperative hospital stays.
Regarding the postoperative complications, RDP and LDP showed similar results except for 30-day mortality (RDP versus LDP, 0.1% versus 1.0%, p = 0.03).

Also Read: Prevalence of ankyloglossia higher among infants and differs as per assessment tool used for diagnosis

RDP is a safe, technologically feasible technique and outperformed LDP on perioperative outcomes despite the cost.

Further reading: Li, P., Zhang, H., Chen, L. et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy on perioperative outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Updates Surg (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-022-01413-3

laparoscopic distal pancreatectomyRobotic distal pancreatectomyRobotic surgeryRDPLDPKimura methodlaparotomyminimally invasive distal pancreatectomy

Source : Updates in Surgery

Dr.Niharika Harsha B

BDS, MDS

Dr.Niharika Harsha B (BDS,MDS) completed her BDS from Govt Dental College, Hyderabad and MDS from Dr.NTR University of health sciences(Now Kaloji Rao University). She has 4 years of private dental practice and worked for 2 years as Consultant Oral Radiologist at a Dental Imaging Centre in Hyderabad. She worked as Research Assistant and scientific writer in the development of Oral Anti cancer screening device with her seniors. She has a deep intriguing wish in writing highly engaging, captivating and informative medical content for a wider audience. She can be contacted at editorial@medicaldialogues.in.

Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli

Dr Kamal Kant Kohli-MBBS, DTCD- a chest specialist with more than 30 years of practice and a flair for writing clinical articles, Dr Kamal Kant Kohli joined Medical Dialogues as a Chief Editor of Medical News. Besides writing articles, as an editor, he proofreads and verifies all the medical content published on Medical Dialogues including those coming from journals, studies,medical conferences,guidelines etc. Email: drkohli@medicaldialogues.in. Contact no. 011-43720751