SC fines BAMS doctor, rejects PIL seeking to direct doctors, hospitals to use COVID cure discovered by him

It considered the PIL to be a sheer waste of the court's precious time and decided to impose fine to make sure that no one should approach the apex court with such contention.

Published On 2020-08-23 04:00 GMT   |   Update On 2020-08-23 04:00 GMT
Advertisement

New Delhi: Holding the claims of a Bachelor of Ayurvedic Medicine and Surgery (BAMS) doctor to have no valid ground and wastage of judicial time, the Supreme Court has slapped a fine of Rs 10000 while dismissing a PIL moved by the medical practitioner that sought to direct all doctors and hospitals to use the COVID-19 cure discovered by him.

The plea submitted by the doctor claimed that he had discovered a potential cure for COVID which is a completely 'desi' or Indian version of the medication. He further asked the court to instruct the Secretary, Health Department, Government of India to take necessary steps so that the medicine discovered by him for treating COVID-19 patients can be utilized all over the country in several health facilities across the country.

Advertisement

However, he failed to convince the court and taking a grim view of the matters, a bench of court including Justices Ajay Rastogi and Aniruddha Bose stated that the validity of his claims has not been proved in the court by the petitioner.

Also Read: Ayurveda Practitioner Served Warning By BMCRI For Allegedly Making False Claims On COVID Cure

The court observed that the claims of the doctor were not justified and had no valid ground. The court further noted that the primary motive behind filing such a case might be to grab some public attention. It considered the PIL to be a sheer waste of the court's precious time and decided to impose fine to make sure that no one should approach the apex court with such contention.

Subsequently, the court dismissed the petition and imposed a fine of Rs 10000. The court held;

"Such wastage of judicial time is completely inappropriate."

"We are of the view that such kind of petitions must be stopped as anybody and everybody thinks they have some cure for the situation," the court added.

The petitioner was instructed to deposit the fined amount in the Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Welfare Fund within the coming four weeks, reports News18.

Tags:    
Article Source : with inputs

Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.

NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News