Bring Medical Associations under Ethical Control - Parliamentary Panel

Published On 2016-03-10 09:41 GMT | Update On 2016-03-10 09:41 GMT

Showing Severe Astonishment over the notification of Medical Council of India, dated 1st February 2016, the Parliamentary Committee has slammed MCI over deleting the words "and professional association of doctors" through an amendment to the clause 6.8 of the MCI Code of Ethics Regulations, 2002. This move of the MCI has allowed professional associations to be exempted from the MCI code of ethics.

The Committee observed that exempting professional association of doctors from the ambit of Ethics Regulations is nothing short of legitimizing doctors’ associations indulging in unethical and corrupt practices by way of receiving gifts in cash or kind under any pretext from the pharma industry or allied health industry.

The Committee also showed an agreement with the view point of public health activists that “an action that is ethically impermissible for an individual doctor cannot become permissible if a group of doctors carry out the same action in the name of an association.”

"The Committee could not uncover any rational reason as to why the MCI has taken such a retrograde decision. It seems that the MCI has become captive to private commercial interests, rather than its integrity in public interest," the said report noted

Ministry Reprimanded

The parliamentary panel also pulled up the ministry of health for its inaction against the MCI over the issue. The panel called immediate adherence to the MCI regulations by professionals and their associations alike. The panel commented:-

"The Committee also finds it intriguing that instead of intervening to thwart attempt of MCI at subverting the system, the Ministry has meekly surrendered to MCI. The Committee recommends that the Ministry should take immediate action in the matter to ensure that the illegality committed in terms of violation of ethical standards of 2002 Regulations, either by an individual doctor or a group of doctors in the form of an association is not kept out of the jurisdiction of MCI and the words “and professional association of doctors” are restored to clause 6.8 of the MCI Code of Ethics Regulations 2002 so that no immunity, whatsoever, is accorded to any association or society of doctors. If there are any other legal infirmities in the framework of the 2002 Regulations, they should be removed."

Whistle-Blower Given Relief

The Parliamentary Standing Committee on Health’s Intervention has also given relief to a whistleblower doctor from Kerala, Dr Babu K.V who had complained to the MCI against IMA, which had signed a Rs.2.25-crore deal with Pepsico for endorsing its products and which Dr. Babu pointed out was in violation of the MCI’s Code of Ethics Regulations, 2002. This has eventually led to his expulsion from the IMA Kerala branch and collision course with MCI, reports Hindu.

Providing relief to the Doctor, the committee, noted

" The Committee taking note of the submissions of the President, MCI that the existing Ethics Committee has closed the case against the whistleblower doctor from Kerala and his wiferecommends that completion of all formalities concerning the closing of the case be expedited by the MCI. The Committee desires to be informed of the final outcome/fulfillment of the assurance made by the President MCI, to the Committee in this regard, within one month from the presentation of this Report.

Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.

NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.

Meghna A Singhania is the founder and Editor-in-Chief at Medical Dialogues. An Economics graduate from Delhi University and a post graduate from London School of Economics and Political Science, her key research interest lies in health economics, and policy making in health and medical sector in the country. She is a member of the Association of Healthcare Journalists. She can be contacted at meghna@medicaldialogues.in. Contact no. 011-43720751

Comments Policy

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Bring Medical Associations under Ethical Control - Parliamentary Panel

Ministry Reprimanded

Whistle-Blower Given Relief

Similar News

Doctors Challenge NMC Regulations Allowing medical MSc, PhD holders as Faculty in core MBBS subjects

Doctors at Delhi's Govt Hospital go on strike after MLA allegedly assaults on-duty doctor

No NMC decision to freeze approvals of new medical colleges, increase in seats: Health Minister tells Parliament

Dr Vatsala Aggarwal takes charge as new Director General DGHS Delhi

IPC 304 A only applicable when doctors commit rash or negligent act: HC relief to doctor

NEET PG 2025 results Declared! 128116 candidates qualify, Normalisation not applied, Check cutoff scores

NEET PG 2025 results delayed? Candidates demand clarity

NEET PG: Mandatory Service for 2 Years or Rs 50 Lakh Penalty- JnK proposes Bond policy