Adding Chlorthalidone can improve BP control even in CKD patients: CLICK study

Written By :  dr. Abhimanyu Uppal
Medically Reviewed By :  Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli
Published On 2022-01-10 05:00 GMT   |   Update On 2023-10-18 09:42 GMT
Advertisement

There has been a general reluctance to the use of thiazide class of diuretics in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD), due to the belief that they lose diuretic efficacy as kidney function declines. Challenging this general perception, in the latest issue of NEJM, Agarwal et al have published the results of CLICK trial that show chlorthalidone therapy improves blood-pressure (BP) control at 12 weeks as compared with placebo in patients with advanced CKD and poorly controlled hypertension.

Advertisement

This ambitious target of SBP< 120mmHg as recommended by recent guidelines is difficult to achieve with currently available antihypertensive medications, particularly in patients with more advanced CKD (stages 4 and 5). The choice of a second- or third-line agent after exhausting options like ACE-inhibitors, ARBs or CCBs is more difficult, largely because of a lack of relevant clinical evidence.

On the basis of preliminary evidence of an effect on BP in patients with CKD, Agarwal et al hypothesized that among patients with advanced CKD and uncontrolled hypertension, chlorthalidone would decrease the 24-hour ambulatory systolic blood pressure and also reduce the degree of albuminuria over 12 weeks and provide preliminary evidence that chlorthalidone is renoprotective and cardioprotective.

They randomly assigned patients with stage 4 CKD and poorly controlled hypertension, in a 1:1 ratio to receive chlorthalidone at an initial dose of 12.5 mg per day, with increases every 4 weeks if needed to a maximum dose of 50 mg per day, or placebo; randomization was stratified according to previous use of loop diuretics.

In the double-blind CLICK trial, 160 patients with stage 4 CKD, 76% of whom had diabetes, were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive chlorthalidone or placebo and were followed over a 14-week period. The primary outcome was the change in 24-hour ambulatory systolic blood pressure from baseline to 12 weeks. Secondary outcomes were the change from baseline to 12 weeks in the urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio, N-terminal pro–B-type natriuretic peptide level, plasma renin and aldosterone levels, and total body volume. Safety was also assessed.

The patients were already receiving a mean of 3.4±1.4 antihypertensive agents, which, in all but two patients, included either an ACE inhibitor or an angiotensin-receptor blocker.

The results showed BP reductions of −11.0 mm Hg in the chlorthalidone group and −0.5 mm Hg in the placebo group.The percent change in the urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio from baseline to 12 weeks was lower in the chlorthalidone group than in the placebo group by 50 percentage points.

Hypokalemia, reversible increases in serum creatinine level, hyperglycemia, dizziness, and hyperuricemia occurred more frequently in the chlorthalidone group than in the placebo group.

These results should dispel concerns that chlorthalidone is "ineffective" as an antihypertensive agent in patients with stage 4 CKD. "This reversible acute drop in eGFR, along with the reduction in albuminuria, suggests that chlorthalidone might reduce intraglomerular pressure in the same way as other classes of drugs with proven renoprotective actions, namely ACE inhibitors, angiotensin-receptor blockers, and sodium–glucose cotransporter inhibitors", notes David C. Wheeler, M.D in an accompanying editorial.

If the results of such a trial were favorable, chlorthalidone could prove to be a valuable addition to the growing number of therapeutic agents of established clinical benefit in the management of CKD.

Source: NEJM:

1. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMe2118149

2. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2110730

Tags:    

Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.

NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News