Moderate-intensity statins and ezetimibe combo okay for very high-risk ASCVD patients: Analysis of RACING trial

Written By :  Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli
Published On 2023-08-08 05:30 GMT   |   Update On 2023-10-18 10:11 GMT

Korea: A combination of ezetimibe with a moderate-intensity statin could be considered an effective and feasible therapeutic option for patients at very high risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), a recent study published in JAMA Cardiology.The post hoc analysis of 1511 patients at very high ASCVD risk from the RACING randomized clinical trial revealed that...

Login or Register to read the full article

Korea: A combination of ezetimibe with a moderate-intensity statin could be considered an effective and feasible therapeutic option for patients at very high risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), a recent study published in JAMA Cardiology.

The post hoc analysis of 1511 patients at very high ASCVD risk from the RACING randomized clinical trial revealed that moderate-intensity statin with ezetimibe combination therapy was comparable with high-intensity statin monotherapy regarding a 3-year primary endpoint. The combination was associated with greater low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) reduction, lower drug intolerance, and achievement of LDL-C less than 70 mg/dL.

The study's primary endpoint was calculated as the 3-year outcome of cardiovascular death, peripheral or coronary revascularization, nonfatal stroke, or hospitalization of cardiovascular events.

The 2018 guideline by the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology on lipid management recommend the initial use of high-intensity statin in very high–risk (VHR) patients with ASCVD, as this population is at greater risk of recurrent ASCVD events. However, concerns about statin-associated adverse effects lead to the underuse of this strategy in practice, despite its distinct and undoubtedly benefit in VHR patients.

Recently, the RACING trial showed the moderate-intensity statin with ezetimibe combination therapy to be noninferior compared with high-intensity statin monotherapy for the 3-year composite cardiovascular outcomes in ASCVD patients. However, whether the effect is preserved among VHR patients is unknown.

To fill this knowledge gap, Seung-Jun Lee, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea, and colleagues sought to investigate the outcome of ezetimibe combination with moderate-intensity statin therapy in VHR patients with ASCVD.

The study was conducted from 2017 to 2018 at 26 centres in Korea. Study participants were patients with documented ASCVD.

Patients were randomly assigned to moderate-intensity statin with ezetimibe (rosuvastatin, 10 mg, with ezetimibe, 10 mg) or high-intensity statin monotherapy (rosuvastatin, 20 mg). Patients at very high risk for ASCVD were defined according to the 2018 AHA/ACC guidelines.

The study led to the following findings:

· A total of 3780 patients (mean age, 64 years; 75% were males) in the RACING trial, 40.0% were categorized as VHR, which was associated with a greater occurrence of the primary end point (hazard ratio [HR], 1.42).

· There was no significant difference in the primary endpoint between those who received combination therapy and high-intensity statin monotherapy among patients with VHR disease (11.2% versus 11.7%; HR, 0.96) and non-VHR disease (7.7% versus 8.7%; HR, 0.88).

· The median LDL cholesterol level was significantly lower in the combination therapy group than in the high-intensity statin group (VHR, 1 year: 57 mg/dL vs 65 mg/dL; non-VHR, 1 year: 58 mg/dL vs 68 mg/dL).

· In both the VHR and non-VHR groups, combination therapy was associated with a significantly greater mean change in LDL-C level (VHR, 1 year: −19.1 mg/dL vs −10.1 mg/dL; 2 years: −22.3 mg/dL vs −13.0 mg/dL; 3 years: −18.8 mg/dL vs −9.7 mg/dL; non-VHR, 1 year: −23.7 mg/dL vs −12.5 mg/dL; 2 years: −25.2 mg/dL vs −15.1 mg/dL; 3 years: −23.5 mg/dL vs −12.6 mg/dL) and proportion of patients with LDL-C level less than 70 mg/dL (VHR, 1 year: 73% vs 58%; non-VHR, 1 year: 72% vs 53%).

· Discontinuation or dose reduction of the lipid-lowering drug due to intolerance occurred less frequently in the combination therapy group (VHR, 4.6% vs 7.7%; non-VHR, 5.0% vs 8.7%).

"By corroborating the RACING trial results, the current study results suggest that an early ezetimibe combination could be a reasonable therapeutic approach for very high-risk patients with ASCVD," the researchers concluded.

Reference:

Lee S, Cha J, Choi WG, et al. Moderate-Intensity Statin With Ezetimibe Combination Therapy vs High-Intensity Statin Monotherapy in Patients at Very High Risk of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease: A Post Hoc Analysis From the RACING Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Cardiol. Published online August 02, 2023. doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2023.2222


Tags:    
Article Source : JAMA Cardiology

Disclaimer: This site is primarily intended for healthcare professionals. Any content/information on this website does not replace the advice of medical and/or health professionals and should not be construed as medical/diagnostic advice/endorsement/treatment or prescription. Use of this site is subject to our terms of use, privacy policy, advertisement policy. © 2024 Minerva Medical Treatment Pvt Ltd

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News