Protamine use for reversal of effects of heparin in PCI not tied to bleeding risk and stent thrombosis

Written By :  Jacinthlyn Sylvia
Medically Reviewed By :  Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli
Published On 2023-07-28 14:30 GMT   |   Update On 2023-10-19 11:09 GMT
Advertisement

A recent study published in the International Journal of Cardiology found evidence supporting the safety and efficacy of using protamine to reverse the effects of heparin in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) procedures.

Heparin, a commonly used anticoagulant during PCI, has been a standard practice in preventing clotting during the procedure. However, the use of protamine to reverse heparin's effects has been limited due to concerns about stent thrombosis, a potentially dangerous complication.

Advertisement

To evaluate the potential risks and benefits of protamine, the team led by Paul Lee conducted an extensive analysis of relevant studies published in English. The study included data from 11 studies and focused on outcomes such as stent thrombosis, mortality, major bleeding complications, and length of hospitalization.

The results of the analysis were groundbreaking. The use of protamine did not show an increased risk of stent thrombosis or mortality. However, the administration of protamine was associated with a significantly decreased incidence of major bleeding complications. Patients who received protamine also experienced a shorter length of hospitalization, indicating potential benefits in terms of recovery and healthcare costs.

The use of protamine could offer a safe and efficacious option for clinicians, allowing for earlier sheath removal, reducing major bleeding complications, and ultimately improving patient outcomes. The study's findings have significant implications for the field of interventional cardiology. By utilizing protamine in PCI procedures, clinicians may have an opportunity to optimize patient care, potentially reducing complications and improving overall recovery.

While the results are promising, further research and validation are still needed to solidify the findings and establish clear guidelines for the use of protamine in PCI. However, this study opens up new possibilities for improving patient outcomes and advancing the field of cardiac interventions.

Reference:

Lee, P. Y., Bello, J., Ye, C., Varadarajan, S., Hossain, A., Jumkhawala, S., Sharma, A., & Allencherril, J. (2023). Safety of routine protamine in the reversal of heparin in percutaneous coronary intervention: A systematic review and meta-analysis. In International Journal of Cardiology (p. 131168). Elsevier BV. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2023.131168

Tags:    
Article Source : International Journal of Cardiology

Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.

NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News