"Reducing pollution is  not only helpful for the environment it may also have significant health  benefits at the population level such as preventing heart attacks," said lead  study author Sidney Aung, B.A., a fourth-year medical student at the University  of California, San Francisco.
    Heart disease is the  leading cause of death in the United States. Untreated, yet modifiable heart disease risk factors such  as smoking, high blood pressure, high blood cholesterol and diabetes, as well  as physical inactivity and excess weight, can contribute to and cause a heart  attack. Previous research has confirmed that environmental conditions such as  air pollution can increase the risk for heart attack.
    According to a 2020 American Heart Association  policy statement citing a global study, ambient air pollution is widely  recognized as a significant contributor to cardiovascular disease and death. In  2017, exposure to particulate air pollution was estimated to be associated with  more than 7 million premature deaths and the loss of 147 million healthy  life-years globally.
    Shelter-in-place  orders to slow the spread of COVID-19 began to be issued in various U.S. cities  and states after the World Health Organization characterized the outbreak as a  pandemic in mid-March 2020. By April 2020, some states began to partially  reopen. Across the time period analyzed in this study, Jan 2019-April 2020, the  number of severe heart attacks dropped substantially in association with  declining ambient pollution levels.
    According to an  international analysis, IQ Air's 2020 World Air Quality Report, global lockdown  measures to slow the spread of COVID-19 resulted in healthier air around the  world in 2020. The report is based on the world's largest database of  ground-based air pollution measurements, aggregating particulate matter 2.5  data published in real-time from ground-based sensors throughout 2020. Less air  pollution was noted, particularly during the initial period of the lockdown  when people were ordered to shelter in place, closing schools and businesses  and reducing vehicle and airplane traffic.
    This study reviewed  daily pollution measurements from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's  website between January 1, 2019, to April 30, 2020, focusing on a common type of  air pollution called particulate matter 2.5, which contains microscopic pieces  of solid substances. Using records from the National Emergency Medical Services  Information System and the U.S. Census, researchers analyzed the frequency of  heart attacks in various regions of the U.S. for the same period.
    Overall, 60,722 heart  attacks occurred during the study. With each 10 µg/m3 (micrograms per cubic meter) drop in particulate matter  2.5, the number of heart attacks decreased by 6%, which translates to 374 fewer  heart attacks per 10,000 person-years.
    "This study highlights  the importance of reducing air pollution, which could, in turn, prevent heart  attacks," Aung said. "We also hope our study may influence other investigators  to pursue similar research to corroborate these results or to investigate other  forms of air pollutants outside of particulate matter 2.5 that may have also declined  during the pandemic lockdowns."
    The study has several  limitations: it is an observational analysis and, therefore, could not  definitively prove cause and effect; it did not evaluate individual-level  information regarding age, sex and race; and heart attacks in the study were  identified by paramedics and other emergency medical services professionals  rather than being diagnosed by physicians.
    "There is extensive  research suggesting that exposure to air pollutants, ozone and traffic-related  pollutants is associated with increased extent of atherosclerosis and increased  underlying risk of heart attack and stroke," said Joel D. Kaufman, M.D.,  M.P.H., chair of the American Heart Association's 2020 policy statement on air  pollution.
    He noted that other  studies have made similar links – such as a rapid drop in acute heart attacks that occurred after public smoking bans reduced secondhand smoke exposure. However,  it is unclear what connections exist between the pandemic lockdown and fewer  heart attacks.
    "It is also possible  that other things were going on last year to reduce heart attack triggers –  fewer exertional activities or other stressors, for example, that were also a  result of the COVID lockdowns," said Kaufman, professor in the department of  environmental and occupational health sciences, medicine and epidemiology at  the University of Washington in Seattle.
    "If it turns out that  we can meaningfully link a reduction in traffic-related air pollution during  COVID lockdowns to a reduction in heart attacks, it points the way toward a  major change that could help to reduce the burden of heart disease. We know how  to reduce air pollution concentrations and have seen that it is possible.
    "This could reinforce  the benefits of air pollution reduction as a cost-effective way to improve  health," he said. "It also means that reducing fossil fuel combustion,  which we need to do anyway to combat climate change, may yield tremendous  health benefits now, even if the climate benefits take years to accrue."
    The American Heart Association  recommends further development of evidence-based policy approaches, continued  investment in research, and greater innovation and transformational partnerships  to reduce the cardiovascular burden of ambient air pollutants in the United  States.
     
 
Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.
NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.