Low Vitamin D Linked to Higher Mortality and Cardiovascular Risk among Lupus Patients: Study

Written By :  Medha Baranwal
Medically Reviewed By :  Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli
Published On 2025-11-24 15:00 GMT   |   Update On 2025-11-24 15:00 GMT
Advertisement

USA: A long-term prospective cohort study has found that lupus patients with low vitamin D — specifically low 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels — at enrollment had significantly worse outcomes. Over an average follow-up of 6 years, these patients experienced twice the risk of all-cause mortality and three times the risk of major cardiovascular events, highlighting the importance of monitoring and managing vitamin D levels in lupus care.

Advertisement
A new analysis from the Johns Hopkins Lupus Cohort, published in Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, provides compelling evidence that vitamin D status plays a meaningful role in long-term outcomes among individuals with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Led by Theerada Assawasaksakul and colleagues from Johns Hopkins University, the study evaluated whether different measures of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25[OH]D) — including baseline, recent, and annual mean values — were linked to mortality and cardiovascular complications such as stroke, myocardial infarction, and angina or coronary bypass.
The cohort began routine quarterly vitamin D testing in 2009, giving researchers a unique opportunity to track levels longitudinally and relate them to clinical events. The prospective arm of the study included 1,768 patients, accounting for more than 11,300 person-years of follow-up.
Findings showed a clear pattern:
  • Patients with vitamin D deficiency (<20 ng/mL) at cohort entry had the highest rates of mortality and cardiovascular events.
  • Compared to those with baseline levels of 30–39 ng/mL, severely deficient patients had over twice the risk of death (HR 2.05).
  • These patients also had nearly three times the risk of major cardiovascular events (HR 2.98).
  • The link between low vitamin D and myocardial infarction alone was not statistically significant.
  • However, the risk of angina or requiring coronary bypass surgery was significantly higher (HR 3.53).
In addition to the main prospective findings, the researchers conducted a lifetime analysis that included events occurring before participants joined the cohort. This broader look supported the same overall trend, with an interesting U-shaped relationship emerging for myocardial infarction risk — a pattern the investigators noted had also appeared in their earlier work on pregnancy outcomes in SLE.
Notably, mean vitamin D levels over the last year and the most recent single measurement did not show a significant association with outcomes. This raises important questions about whether vitamin D supplementation, often initiated after deficiency is detected, is sufficient to modify long-term cardiovascular or mortality risk. According to the authors, the results highlight that baseline vitamin D status — potentially reflecting cumulative deficiency over years — may be more influential than short-term improvements following supplementation.
The study adds to growing evidence that cardiovascular disease continues to be a major concern in lupus care, and it highlights the potential role of vitamin D as a marker of risk. While the findings do not establish causation or confirm that correcting vitamin D deficiency can change outcomes, they point to the value of routine monitoring and early intervention.
"As clinicians continue to search for modifiable factors that could improve long-term prognosis in lupus, these results suggest that attention to vitamin D levels at the time of diagnosis or early in disease management may be particularly important," the authors concluded.
Reference:
Assawasaksakul T, Fava A, Goldman D, Magder LS, Petri M. 25-Hydroxyvitamin D levels are associated with mortality and cardiovascular events in systemic lupus erythematosus. Ann Rheum Dis. 2025 Nov 11:S0003-4967(25)04452-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ard.2025.10.013. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 41224553.


Tags:    
Article Source : Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases

Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.

NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News