Skeletonized vs Pedicled Internal Thoracic Artery Harvesting Techniques: Long-term Clinical Outcomes

However, recently, a post hoc analysis of the COMPASS trial reported a significantly higher rate of graft occlusion and adverse cardiovascular events for patients who received skeletonized vs pedicled ITAs. So, Mario Gaudino et.al, conducted this study to compare the long-term clinical outcomes of skeletonized and pedicled ITA for CABG.

The Arterial Revascularization Trial was a 2-group, multicenter trial comparing the use of a bilateral ITA vs a single ITA for CABG at 10 years. Patients in the ART trial were stratified by ITA harvesting technique: skeletonized vs pedicled and the 10-year clinical outcomes were compared. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. The secondary outcomes were a composite of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) including all-cause mortality,myocardial infarction, and repeated revascularization and a composite including MACE and sternal wound complication.

Findings of this study are

1) all-cause mortality was not significantly different between the pedicled and skeletonized groups.

2) long-term risks of the secondary outcomes were significantly higher in the skeletonized group compared with the pedicled group.

3) The difference was not seen when considering only patients operated on by surgeons who enrolled 51 patients or more in the trial.

Authors concluded that "the rate of adverse cardiovascular events was consistently higher in the

skeletonized group and the difference was associated with surgeon-related factors."

Source:JAMA Cardiology; doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2021.3866