·           We suggest against transfusion of RBCs if  the blood hemoglobin concentration is greater than or equal to 7 g/dL in  hemodynamically stabilized children with septic shock or other sepsis-associated organ dysfunction.
    ·           We cannot make a recommendation regarding  hemoglobin transfusion thresholds for critically ill children with unstable septic shock.
    ·           We suggest against prophylactic platelet  transfusion based solely on platelet levels in nonbleeding children with septic shock or other sepsis-associated organ dysfunction and thrombocytopenia 
    ·          We suggest against prophylactic plasma  transfusion in nonbleeding children with septic shock or other sepsis-associated organ dysfunction and coagulation abnormalities 
    Plasma Exchange, Renal Replacement, and Extra Corporeal  Support
    ·           We suggest against using plasma exchange  (PLEX) in children with septic shock or other sepsis-associated organ dysfunction without thrombocytopenia-associated  multiple organ failure (TAMOF).
    ·          We cannot suggest for or against the use of  PLEX in children with septic shock or other sepsis-associated organ dysfunction with TAMOF.
    ·          We suggest using renal replacement therapy to  prevent or treat fluid overload in children with septic shock or other sepsis-associated organ dysfunction who are unresponsive to fluid  restriction and diuretic therapy.
    ·          We suggest against high-volume hemofiltration  (HVHF) over standard hemofiltration in children with septic shock or other sepsis-associated organ dysfunction who are treated with renal  replacement therapy.
    ·          We suggest using venovenous ECMO in children  with sepsis-induced PARDS and  refractory hypoxia .
    ·          We suggest using venoarterial ECMO as a rescue  therapy in children with septic shock only if  refractory to all other treatments.
    Immunoglobulins
    ·          We suggest against the routine use of IV immune  globulin (IVIG) in children with septic shock or other sepsis-associated organ dysfunction.
    Prophylaxis 
    ·           We suggest against the routine use of  stress ulcer prophylaxis in critically ill children with septic shock or other sepsis-associated organ dysfunction, except for high-risk patients.
    ·           We suggest against routine deep vein  thrombosis (DVT) prophylaxis (mechanical or pharmacologic) in critically ill  children with septic shock or other sepsis-associated organ dysfunction, but potential benefits may  outweigh risks and costs in specific populations.
    “A large cohort of international experts was able to achieve  consensus regarding many recommendations for the best care of children with sepsis, acknowledging that most aspects of care had relatively low  quality of evidence resulting in the frequent issuance of weak recommendations.  Despite this challenge, these recommendations regarding the management of  children with septic shock and other sepsis-associated organ dysfunction provide a foundation for  consistent care to improve outcomes and inform future research,” concluded the  authors. 
 
Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.
NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.