Honeycomb Surface Design Enhances Bond Strength of 3D-Printed Zirconia, Study Finds

Written By :  Medha Baranwal
Medically Reviewed By :  Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli
Published On 2025-04-14 15:15 GMT   |   Update On 2025-04-14 15:16 GMT
Advertisement

China: A recent study published in the Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry has highlighted a promising advancement in dental materials, demonstrating that modifying zirconia surfaces with honeycomb-like structures significantly boosts their bond strength. The research explored the potential of 3D printing technology to create surface patterns that improve the adhesion of zirconia to other dental materials—a key concern in prosthetic and restorative dentistry

In dental applications, one of the key limitations to the widespread clinical use of zirconia is its poor bonding affinity to resin materials. While surface microstructures have been shown to enhance bonding performance, the impact of specifically designed honeycomb patterns remains insufficiently understood. To address this, Xiaoqiang Liu, Department of Prosthodontics Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing, PR CHINA, and colleagues aimed to investigate how honeycomb surface modifications influence the bond strength to zirconia fabricated using advanced customized jetting (ACJ), a cutting-edge 3D printing technology.

For this purpose, the researchers designed honeycomb-patterned zirconia surfaces with varying depths (60, 80, and 100 µm) and widths (100, 200, and 300 µm) to assess their effect on bond strength. Control samples were polished and sandblasted. Each group was divided based on the application of 10-methacryloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate (MDP). Surface roughness was evaluated using an optical profiler, and resin cylinders were bonded using resin cement. Shear bond strength (SBS) was tested mechanically, and fracture patterns were examined under a stereomicroscope. Statistical analyses included the Shapiro-Wilk, Levene, three-way ANOVA, and Kruskal-Wallis tests to determine significant differences across groups.

The study led to the following findings:

  • The honeycomb design with 100 µm depth and 300 µm width demonstrated the highest surface roughness (Sa) of 15.34 µm.
  • Specimens treated with 10-methacryloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate (MDP) exhibited significantly greater shear bond strength (SBS) than those without MDP.
  • In groups without MDP, the control showed an SBS of 7.11 ± 2.4 MPa, while the 100 µm depth and 300 µm width honeycomb group achieved the highest SBS at 11.38 ± 2.0 MPa—an increase of 60.6%.
  • Among MDP-treated groups, SBS values were significantly higher in specimens with 100 µm depth and widths of 200 µm (14.73 ± 2.6 MPa) and 300 µm (16.39 ± 3.0 MPa) compared to controls (12.50 ± 2.3 MPa).
  • The group with 100 µm depth and 300 µm width under MDP treatment showed a 31.1% improvement in SBS over controls.
  • Adhesive and mixed failures were more common in non-MDP groups, while cohesive and mixed failures predominated in MDP-treated samples.

The study demonstrates that integrating honeycomb surface structures on zirconia, particularly when combined with 10-methacryloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate treatment, can significantly enhance shear bond strength.

"Both the depth and width of these microstructures play a critical role in determining bond performance, highlighting the importance of optimized surface design in improving the bonding efficacy of 3D-printed zirconia in dental applications," the authors wrote.

Reference:

Cao, X., Lyu, J., Li, Y., Zhou, Y., Tan, J., & Liu, X. (2025). Effects of honeycomb surfaces on bond strength to zirconia fabricated with 3-dimensional printing. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2025.03.023


Tags:    
Article Source : Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.

NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News