Hydrogen Peroxide Concentration: Whitening Efficacy vs. Sensitivity

Written By :  Dr. Shravani Dali
Published On 2025-12-31 15:00 GMT   |   Update On 2025-12-31 15:01 GMT
Advertisement

​Researchers have found in a new study that there is a direct trade-off between the strength of a whitening treatment and its side effects.​35% Hydrogen Peroxide: Provides the most effective whitening results in a professional setting, but carries a significantly higher risk of intense Tooth Sensitivity (TS) whereas ​6% Hydrogen Peroxide: Acts as a safer alternative that reduces the likelihood and severity of sensitivity, though it results in less noticeable whitening.

Advertisement

This randomized, parallel, double-blind clinical trial aimed to evaluate the equivalence in bleaching efficacy (BE), as well as the risk and intensity of tooth sensitivity (TS), in participants undergoing in-office dental bleaching with low (6%) versus high-concentration (35%) hydrogen peroxide. A total of 140 participants were randomly assigned to one of the two groups according to the bleaching gel concentration used: 6% hydrogen peroxide (Automixx 6%, FGM) or 35% hydrogen peroxide (Automixx Plus 35%, FGM). The bleaching procedure was performed for 50 min in three sessions, with a 1-week interval. The bleaching procedure was performed for 50 min in three sessions, with a 1-week interval. BE was evaluated using a Vita Easyshade spectrophotometer (ΔE00, ΔEab, and ΔWID) and both Vita Classical and Vita Bleachedguide shade guides (ΔSGU) at days 7, 14, and 21, and 1 month after completion of treatment. The risk and intensity of TS were recorded using a visual analogue scale (VAS; 0 to 10), assessed immediately after each of the three bleaching sessions, and at 1, 24, and 48 h posttreatment. BE was assessed with a paired Student's t-test. The absolute risk of Tooth Sensitivity was evaluated using Fisher's exact test, and the Tooth Sensitivity intensity was assessed using a paired Student's t test (α = 0.05).


Results: Nonequivalent bleaching outcomes were observed between the groups across all instruments and time points (p > 0.05). The 35% hydrogen peroxide group showed significantly greater efficacy than the 6% group (MD in ΔE00 = 6.3; 90% CI 4.8–7.7; p < 0.05). The risk of Tooth Sensitivity was lower in the 6% group (44%) compared with the 35% group (74%; p = 0.0005). Sensitivity intensity was also significantly lower in the 6% group up to 24 h posttreatment (p < 0.01).


In-office dental bleaching with 6% and 35% hydrogen peroxide resulted in significant tooth whitening; however, the outcomes were not equivalent across all evaluation time points, with the 35% concentration demonstrating superior efficacy throughout the study. In contrast, Tooth Sensitivity was significantly higher in the 35% group compared with the 6% group. While 35% hydrogen peroxide delivers more effective tooth whitening in-office, it is also associated with a higher risk and intensity of Tooth Sensitivity. Lower concentrations like 6% offer a safer alternative with reduced sensitivity but less whitening efficacy.


Reference:

G. G. Centenaro, M. W. Favoreto, T. d. S. Carneiro, D. C. F. Cordeiro, and A. D. Loguercio, “ Efficacy and Tooth Sensitivity of Low- Versus High-Concentration Hydrogen Peroxide for In-Office Bleaching: A Randomized Clinical Trial,” Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry (2025): 1–10, https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.70090.


Keywords;

Hydrogen, Peroxide, Concentration, Whitening, Efficacy, Sensitivity, G. G. Centenaro, M. W. Favoreto, T. d. S. Carneiro, D. C. F. Cordeiro, and A. D. Loguercio




Tags:    
Article Source : Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry

Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.

NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News