ProTaper Next system combined with manual nickel-titanium Hedstrom could reduce apical extrusion and remove filling materials
ProTaper Next system (PTN) combined with manual nickel-titanium Hedstrom (MNiTiH) could reduce the apical extrusion and remove filling materials more efficiently than PTN combined with chloroform suggests a new study published in the Scientific Reports
Root canal treatment aims to reduce the intracanal bacterial content that will then allow periradicular lesions to heal. Due to the complexity of the anatomy of the root canal system and the severity of endodontic infection, the failure rate of root canal treatment reported in the literature is as high as 17%. Root canal retreatment is usually the preferred option for teeth in which endodontic treatment has failed, as there is a greater opportunity to eradicate any intraradicular source of infection compared with a surgical approach. Ideally, initial filling should be entirely removed in the process of root canal retreatment because the remnants containing microorganisms could compromise the effectiveness of canal disinfection using canal irrigation and intracanal medication. Therefore, the complete removal of the filling material remnants may be considered an important step for successful endodontic retreatment
This study aimed to evaluate the removal effect of the ProTaper Next system (PTN) combined with manual nickel-titanium Hedström (MNiTiH) files or chloroform on filling materials of mandibular incisors by microcomputed tomography (micro-CT). Sixty-four extracted human mandibular incisors were finally selected and assigned to two groups (n = 32) based on root canal morphology after instrumentation. Two subgroups (n = 16) were formed based on two retreatment methods.
The volume of residual filling materials (RFMs) and the surface area covered by RFMs were analyzed by micro-CT, the apical extrusion and the time taken for removing the filling materials were recorded. A smaller percentage of the volume of RFMs and less surface area covered by RFMs occurred in PTN combined with MNiTiH groups and round-shaped canal incisors (P < 0.05). The time taken for removing the filling materials was not significantly different in all groups (P > 0.05). The apical extrusion was significantly less in PTN combined with MNiTiH groups than in PTN combined with chloroform groups (P < 0.05). Neither of the two methods rendered root canals completely free from filling materials.
ProTaper Next system (PTN) combined with manual nickel-titanium Hedström (MNiTiH) could reduce the apical extrusion and remove filling materials more efficiently than PTN combined with chloroform.
Reference:
Yang, X., Wang, Y., Ji, M. et al. Microcomputed tomographic analysis of the efficiency of two retreatment techniques in removing root canal filling materials from mandibular incisors. Sci Rep 13, 2267 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-29156-0
Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.
NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.