Abrocitinib bests dupilumab for treating moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: Lancet

Written By :  Dr. Shravani Dali
Medically Reviewed By :  Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli
Published On 2022-08-18 05:45 GMT   |   Update On 2023-10-19 09:01 GMT
Advertisement

Abrocitinib 200 mg per day is more efficacious than dupilumab in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis according to a recent study published in the Lancet.

Phase 3 trials have assessed the efficacy of abrocitinib versus placebo in moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis, a common immunoinflammatory skin disease. This study assessed the efficacy and safety of abrocitinib versus dupilumab.

Advertisement

This randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled, parallel-treatment, phase 3 trial enrolled adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis who required systemic therapy or had an inadequate response to topical medications. Participants were enrolled from 151 sites, located in Australia, Bulgaria, Canada, Chile, Finland, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Latvia, Poland, Slovakia, South Korea, Spain, Taiwan, and the USA. These participants were then randomly assigned with block randomisation to receive oral abrocitinib (200 mg per day) or subcutaneous dupilumab (300 mg every 2 weeks) for 26 weeks. Participants were required to apply topical corticosteroids (medium or low potency), topical calcineurin inhibitors, or a topical phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor to active lesion areas. Primary endpoints were responses based on achieving a 4-point or higher improvement in Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (PP-NRS4) at week 2 and a 90% or better improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI-90) at week 4. Family-wise type 1 error was controlled via a sequential multiple-testing procedure ( Randomly assigned participants who received at least one dose of study intervention were included in the efficacy and safety analysis sets.

The results of the study are:

  • Between June 11, 2020, and Dec 16, 2020, 940 patients were screened and 727 were enrolled (362 in the abrocitinib group and 365 in the dupilumab group).
  • Compared with dupilumab, a larger proportion of patients treated with abrocitinib reached the primary outcomes, PP-NRS4 at week 2, and EASI-90 at week 4.
  • Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported by 268 (74%) of 362 patients treated with abrocitinib and by 239 (65%) of 365 patients treated with dupilumab.
  • Two non-treatment-related deaths occurred in the abrocitinib group.

Thus, Abrocitinib 200 mg per day was more efficacious than dupilumab in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis on background topical therapy in inducing early reductions of itch and atopic dermatitis disease signs. Both treatments were well tolerated over 26 weeks.

Reference:

Kristian Reich, Jacob P Thyssen, Andrew Blauvelt, Kilian Eyerich, Weily Soong, Zakiya P Rice, H Chih-ho Hong, Norito Katoh, Fernando Valenzuela, Marco DiBonaventura, Tamara A Bratt, Fan Zhang, Claire Clibborn, Ricardo Rojo, Hernan Valdez, Urs Kerkmann. Efficacy and safety of abrocitinib versus dupilumab in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: a randomised, double-blind, multicentre phase 3 trial. July 23, 2022DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01199-0

Keywords:

Abrocitinib, efficacious, dupilumab, adults, moderate-to-severe, atopic, dermatitis, Kristian Reich, Jacob P Thyssen, Andrew Blauvelt, Kilian Eyerich, Weily Soong, Zakiya P Rice, H Chih-ho Hong, Norito Katoh, Fernando Valenzuela, Marco DiBonaventura, Tamara A Bratt, Fan Zhang, Claire Clibborn, Ricardo Rojo, Hernan Valdez, Urs Kerkmann, Efficacy and safety

Tags:    
Article Source : The Lancet

Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.

NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News