Polyethylene glycol loxenatide promising for treating diabetes patients resistant or intolerant to metformin

Written By :  Medha Baranwal
Medically Reviewed By :  Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli
Published On 2023-11-07 04:30 GMT   |   Update On 2023-11-07 04:47 GMT
Advertisement

Egypt: A meta-analysis published in Scientific Reports has shed light on the safety and efficacy of polyethylene glycol loxenatide (PEX168), a novel glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist with a longer half-life developed by modifying the exenatide's chemical structure, in type 2 diabetic patients.

The study showed that PEX168 could be a viable option for the treatment of diabetic patients who cannot tolerate metformin or whose metformin control is inadequate.

Advertisement

"The combination of PEX168 at 100 ug and metformin was found to be safe and more effective compared to metformin; however, due to the small number of trials included, these findings should be interpreted with caution, and there is a need for additional trials," the researchers wrote.

Hazem Mohamed Salamah, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt, and colleagues performed a meta-analysis to summarize the safety and efficacy of PEX168 monotherapy or as an add-on therapy to metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes. Network meta-analysis was used to find the optimal dose.

For this purpose, the researchers searched the online databases from inception till April 25, 2023, for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing PEX168 therapy alone or in combination with metformin versus other therapies. The risk ratio (RR) was used for dichotomous outcomes and mean difference (MD) was used for continuous outcomes. Six RCTs, comprising 1248 participants, were included.

The researchers reported the following findings:

  • PEX168 added to metformin was significantly better than metformin alone regarding fasting blood glucose (MD = −1.20), HbA1c (MD = −1.01), and postprandial glycemia (MD = −1.94).
  • PEX168 monotherapy was superior to placebo for glycemic control.
  • No significant effects were found in terms of triglycerides, low-density lipoprotein, or high-density lipoprotein.
  • There was a significant reduction in body weight in obese diabetic patients receiving PEX168 compared to the control group (MD = −5.46) but not in non-obese patients (MD = 0.06).
  • People who received PEX168 alone or with metformin showed more common gastrointestinal adverse effects, especially nausea and vomiting.
  • PEX168 100, 200, and 300 ug monotherapy demonstrated comparable safety and diabetes control to metformin, but when combined with metformin, PEX168 100 and 200 ug showed significant effects on diabetes control; however, only the latter showed a significantly higher incidence of nausea and vomiting.

"In type 2 diabetic patients with inadequate control of metformin or those who cannot tolerate metformin, PEX168 as monotherapy or add-on therapy to metformin may be a promising treatment option for glycemic control, and for body weight management in type 2 diabetic patients with obesity; however, due to the small number of RCTs included, this should be interpreted with caution and further trials are needed," the researchers wrote.

"Current evidence suggests that the combination of PEX168 at 100 ug and metformin is the optimal dose; however, there is a need for further research to refute or confirm these findings and assess the long-term efficacy and safety of PEX168 in type 2 diabetes management," they concluded.

Reference:

Salamah, H. M., Marey, A., Elsayed, E., Hasan, M. T., Mahmoud, A., Abualkhair, K. A., Essam, D., & Abdelhaleem, I. A. (2023). Efficacy and safety of polyethylene glycol loxenatide in type 2 diabetic patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-46274-x


Tags:    
Article Source : Scientific Reports

Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.

NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News