Prenatal use of GLP-1 RAs and other second-line antidiabetics do not increase congenital malformations risk in infants
USA: A recent study published in JAMA Internal Medicine has provided reassurance of the safety of GLP-1 receptor agonists and other noninsulin second-line antidiabetic medications (ADMs) during pregnancy.
The study led by Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health revealed that infants born to women with pre-gestational type 2 diabetes who take second-line non-insulin antidiabetic medications during pregnancy are at no higher risk of major congenital malformations (MCMs) than infants born to those who take insulin.
While MCMs, including major cardiac malformations, are more prevalent among infants born to women with pre-gestational diabetes, the researchers observed no differences in risk between infants whose mothers treated their diabetes with insulin versus with non-insulin second-line ADMs.
The study also found an increase in use of second-line non-insulin ADMs throughout the study period, especially the use of GLP-1 receptor agonists in the U.S., suggesting the number of infants prenatally exposed to these drugs will continue to increase.
The study will be published on December 11, 2023, in JAMA Internal Medicine. It is the first large study to examine the potential risks second-line non-insulin ADMs pose to fetal development in humans.
“As type 2 diabetes becomes a more common condition among women of reproductive age, and with the recent approval of GLP-1 receptor agonists such as semaglutide to treat obesity, the number of exposed pregnancies is likely to increase. Our findings provide initial reassurance of safety for infants prenatally exposed to these medications,” said first author Carolyn Cesta, assistant professor at Karolinska Institutet in Sweden.
Using health databases in Finland, Iceland, Norway, Sweden, the United States, and Israel, the researchers examined the outcomes of more than 3.5 million pregnancies between 2009 and 2021. Among these pregnancies, 51,826 (1.5%) comprised the study group of women with pre-gestational type 2 diabetes. In the periconceptional period-between three months before and three months after conception-15,148 (29.2%) of these individuals filled a prescription for a first- or second-line ADM.
The study found that infants whose mother had pre-gestational type 2 diabetes had a substantially higher prevalence of MCMs, including cardiac malformations, compared with infants in the general population. Within the study population of women with type 2 diabetes, 5.58% of infants were born with an MCM and 2.25% were born with a cardiac malformation, compared to 3.76% and 1.31%, respectively, of infants born to the general population. However, within infants born to women with diabetes who took second-line non-insulin ADMs-sulfonylureas, DPP-4 inhibitors, GLP-1 receptor agonists, or SGLT2 inhibitors—the study did not find a greater risk of MCMs after periconceptional exposure compared with infants exposed to insulin.
The researchers noted that some of the study’s findings were imprecise and that continuous monitoring and further research will provide more precise risk estimates.
“As more and more parents and their health care providers search for evidence on the safety of these medications, our research can help inform their decisions,” said senior author Sonia Hernández-Díaz, professor of epidemiology at Harvard Chan School.
Reference:
Cesta CE, Rotem R, Bateman BT, et al. Safety of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists and Other Second-Line Antidiabetics in Early Pregnancy. JAMA Intern Med. Published online December 11, 2023.
doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.6663
Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.
NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.